Watch Dogs' fabled E3 2012 appearance has left many wondering where exactly those graphical details had disappeared in the later editions of the game, and it seems those enhancements aren't exactly "gone" thanks to a recent PC mod by
TheWorse.
Overnight, the modder in question revealed through some tweaking of .ini files that Ubisoft has indeed kept the spectacular looking E3 2012 features, though obviously chosen to hide them from plain sight. As well as unlocking past features, modder TheWorse has also added new effects into the game in the form of LoD changes, fog default values increased, performance improvements and rain changes.
“I realized it was based on dunia 2 so I tried to unpack the files which obviously not worked,” says
TheWorse on Guru3D (via
games.on.net). “After searching so much for the unpacker I found it, started playing with it and after a long time of testing I ended up getting the E3 Bloom from 2012 working.”
“After studying how bin hex worked and downloading many tools to convert files etc, I was able to integrate and enable many effects.”
You can download the mod directly from
the Guru3D website, though be warned that this mod is still in progress so expect bugs and graphical glitches.
Posted 10:56am 17/6/14
I've read all the dumb speculations about why this happened and I prefer to go with the simplest explanation... Frankly none of them are "Simple" with out being crackpot conspiracies.
Posted 11:15am 17/6/14
there is no issue de-tuning something to work on on a lesser system, like an xbox 360, vs an xbone
but it is different de-tuning it to prevent lost sales of a console (which is about the only reason I can see this sort of s*** happening, I wonder how much pressure MS and sony put to make this happen)
Posted 11:51am 17/6/14
Posted 12:19pm 17/6/14
Posted 12:31pm 17/6/14
Ubisoft are sticking by their claim that graphics were not downgraded on Watchdogs.
s-have-not-been-downgraded-ubisoft-says/1100-64181 71/
7088
http://www.gamespot.com/articles/watch-dogs-visual
https://twitter.com/UbiTessa/status/47862229566229
Posted 12:58pm 17/6/14
I thought someone said the new consoles would fix everything - so far I can't see an end to this s*** fest.
Posted 01:09pm 17/6/14
Posted 01:47pm 17/6/14
Posted 01:59pm 17/6/14
Posted 02:08pm 17/6/14
That would make sense if it was only just Ubisoft doing this. It isn't though.
Posted 02:23pm 17/6/14
Well you can't put all the blame on Sony and Microsoft either. You were making out that they are the main problem.
Posted 02:31pm 17/6/14
http://www.dsogaming.com/news/watch_dogs-unbelieva
Posted 02:33pm 17/6/14
Posted 02:40pm 17/6/14
Well considering some of the issues Watchdogs had on Xbox and PlayStation maybe they are just better off being PC only lol. I know a lot of the Xbox community were not very happy with some things.
Posted 03:42pm 17/6/14
Definitely increases performance though that's for sure. Have no stutters and FPS is far higher on all ultra with my 770 4GB.
Posted 03:52pm 17/6/14
Posted 03:54pm 17/6/14
Posted 09:10am 18/6/14
Get your filthy words out of my mouth. My first post is rather clear without your translations.
----------
I totally forgot that FarCry was a Ubisoft game. Inb4 another s*** fest where the game doesn't match the trailer videos. Inb4 hidden code that many PC's can now handle.
Posted 09:16am 18/6/14
Lol you going to spend another day carrying on about this?
Posted 09:19am 18/6/14
Because posting twice in a whole day is carrying on. Aren't you the dramatic one.
Posted 09:23am 18/6/14
Maybe take your issue up with Ubisoft themselves like everyone else has been. Here is where we are talking about it.
http://forums.ubi.com/showthread.php/892116-You-DI
Posted 09:27am 18/6/14
Posted 09:32am 18/6/14
Posted 09:40am 18/6/14
Posted 09:58am 18/6/14
you said they weren't to blame, but infact if they pay money to make sure a game looks the same on PC and console, then they can infact be to blame to a large degree
(I really dont think you know just how much influence businesses can have on things from time to time, ie, most of the layout of sweets and so on at the counters at coles/woolies aren't based on what sells the best, or what they want to shift, but based on who pays the most for what spot, and it isn't a little amount of money either (far more than you might make in profit from pure sales alone)
also, which is the most profitable stream for a company. if they (for reasons of simple maths) sell 1/3 to sony systems, 1/3 to xbox systems and 1/3 to PC to get a company to pay for "the best it can look" code package, you would approach sony and microsoft for 2/3's of the market, but who would you approach for pc?, a PC is there for more than gaming, end the high end market isn't geared to gamers (it might be used by, and from time to time marketed to, but it isn't the reason for it being made) you are not going to find anyone to chip in the big bucks
so would you as a company stand to lose millions of dollars in payments for "system support" from sony and microsoft in order to provide the best game you could (while at the same time selling the same amount of units) or miss out, and provide the best game you can
Posted 10:02am 18/6/14
I said you cant put 'all' the blame on them lol.
Posted 10:04am 18/6/14
Posted 10:09am 18/6/14
Sigh. Seriously this isn't a conspiracy. It's business nothing else. Ubisoft are the ones who write the code for the games. They chose to leave the effects out of the game. So why blame Microsoft and Sony?
Posted 10:37am 18/6/14
Posted 10:54am 18/6/14
Posted 04:09pm 18/6/14
Why wouldn't they make decisions like this when theres no real obvious downside for them? Get all the big console dollars and PC schmucks are gonna buy whatever they get shovelled anyway, win win.
Posted 04:14pm 18/6/14
Posted 04:18pm 18/6/14
Buying PC games from Ubisoft has been a sucker's game for a long time :(
Posted 06:22pm 21/6/14
Posted 07:08pm 22/6/14
Posted 07:40pm 22/6/14
Posted 09:03pm 22/6/14
I bet you $50 you can't let this thread go without having the last word
Posted 09:07pm 22/6/14
Posted 10:57pm 22/6/14
Last word.
Posted 11:57pm 22/6/14
Posted 12:06am 23/6/14
Posted 12:17am 23/6/14
Posted 12:26am 23/6/14
Posted 01:13am 23/6/14
Posted 10:00am 23/6/14
It's not 'apparently' important lol. It's big money business and if anyone knows how business works they would understand that this dispute is a load of codswallop. Anyway Microsoft just updated us on some info about console resolution so maybe you might rethink how much the Xbox One is this piece of garbage everyone is saying it is.
will-support-4k-output-resolution-and-3d
http://www.polygon.com/2013/5/23/4359450/xbox-one-
Posted 10:07am 23/6/14
And it only exists due to this perpetual culture that consoles are the be-all-end-all. Keep that image up, money rolls in, everyone has a console, you're not cool if you don't have a console, you need cod cause everyone has it, etc.
Break any part of this filthy perpetual cycle and people will leak out like ants from an ant mound made of animal turds. Once they get a breath of fresh air and realise they have lived in a pile of turd their whole life, they'll buy a Intel/GTX powered PC and never look back. Sony and MS (surprisingly enough) are worried about this.
So from here they need to hang onto as many people like Jeffro as they can. It's now or never for the console peasants.
See? This stuff is what feeds Microsoft more money. Let's ignore the fact that the console hardly has any games 1080 @ 60fps, but move even further to say they're going to render at 4K resolutions. I'm not a rocket scientist or anything but something about this story doesn't add up.
Posted 10:11am 23/6/14
I'm not getting into a debate on that. As this is a old article that was only just recently updated but I will say we have a lot more games on the way that will be 1080p @60 fps.
Posted 10:17am 23/6/14
yeah pacman
Posted 10:25am 23/6/14
You trolling me brah?
Posted 10:27am 23/6/14
I will say that no 3D game will ever release on the xbox at 4K res. No, none, never. A PC GPU with a metric f***-ton more power is at the 30fps @ 4K level. Ignoring this fact is what makes you such an avid Microsoft peon.
4K will be used for photos, movie clips, "possibly" dvd/bluray, and "possibly" very simple games such as Pacman above, Pitfall, or E.T. The Extra Terrestrial remake.
Posted 10:30am 23/6/14
Posted 10:39am 23/6/14
Posted 10:52am 23/6/14
Posted 10:55am 23/6/14
I gotta say, I don't often buy into conspiracies, but is the one proposed by this thread really that far-fetched? All it would take is some money changing hands, and deliberately gimping a game is completely legal so there really is no risk involved for Ubisoft. Also is this the only statement they have released on the matter -
Because that is a big steaming pile of evasive bulls***. In particular the part I bolded.
Posted 11:00am 23/6/14
Posted 11:07am 23/6/14
Nah, all that actually proves is that the above statement applies to you and consoles, because you're willing to say incredibly dumb things to try and get a reaction out of people.
Posted 11:20am 23/6/14
Posted 12:08pm 23/6/14
Posted 12:18pm 23/6/14
Posted 12:20pm 23/6/14
Lol Whoop your the one who bumped this dead thread yesterday so you could get some more trolling in.
Posted 12:23pm 23/6/14
Realistically, they probably wouldn't, they'd probably just not play games, or play something on their phone. The vast majority of gamers out there aren't like us, they aren't tech savvy and aren't willing to jump through the hoops that gaming on a PC currently requires. I guess thats the main driving goal behind the whole Steam Box thing, to make PC gaming more console-like and accessible.
I've played WoW with people who know basically nothing about their PC, and if someone didn't set it up for them and install everything for them, and they have to do anything outside of click the World of Warcraft shortcut on the desktop, they're lost and have no idea what to do. They play WoW and watch Youtube on their PCs, then go do all their other gaming on a console.
Like it or not, we're a shrinking minority, the tech-savvy gamer. Maybe not so much shrinking because theres less of us, but more because theres more of them. We aren't the average 'gamer' anymore, we aren't the target demographic.
Posted 12:43pm 23/6/14
Lol you going to spend another day carrying on about this?
Ding ding ding. Watch it go!
Posted 12:34pm 23/6/14
Posted 12:42pm 23/6/14
i think this is why i enjoy the utter disdain for consoles from the usual types on this forum more and more
Posted 12:44pm 23/6/14
Realistically, this is correct. However the point of my posts this very moment is to keep that filthy Jeffro on his toes as long as humanly possible and nothing more. Actually carrying a logical discussion over the future of gaming and/or hardware performance would be a waste of time.
It's like convincing your mate at the club (with 3AM faculties) that she's the opposite of hot. Possibly even that she is a he.. - The only notion you can rest against is that tomorrow, after lunch, he'll listen to you more often.. ;)
Posted 12:46pm 23/6/14
Posted 12:56pm 23/6/14
I'm from GameArena bro. ^_^
Don't feel so bad though, every forum has its snake oil buyers - Sony and MS needs these kinds of people to survive in the long run. Did you know there are people out there who swear that playing them $100-$129 (are games still over $100 for consoles or has that calmed down?) FPS games using a console controller is vastly superior to KB/mouse?