Bethesda's epic sci-fi RPG is here, and it's a big one. From shipbuilding to exploring the surface of Mars, our thoughts so far.
Starfield Review... In Progress
The first trailer for Grand Theft Auto 6 is finally here.
Grand Theft Auto 6 Trailer
We take an in-depth look at Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora and tell you why it should be heavily on your radar!
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora - a Deep-Dive into its Potential
Range-wise, the ROG Rapture GT6 is phenomenal, and it's ideal for all gaming and non-gaming-related tasks.
ASUS ROG Rapture GT6 WiFi 6 Mesh System Review
Post by Eorl @ 09:59am 24/08/13 | 19 Comments
Microsoft Corp. has today announced that Chief Executive Officer Steve Ballmer, the quite energetic and developer-friendly figurehead of Microsoft, will be resigning as CEO within the next 12 months, upon the completion of the process for a successor.

Ballmer has said that he will continue as CEO until the process has completed, leading Microsoft through the next steps of its transformation to a more devices and services orientated company.
“There is never a perfect time for this type of transition, but now is the right time,” Ballmer said. “We have embarked on a new strategy with a new organization and we have an amazing Senior Leadership Team. My original thoughts on timing would have had my retirement happen in the middle of our company’s transformation to a devices and services company. We need a CEO who will be here longer term for this new direction.”
According to the official press release, a special committee has been appointed by the Board of Directors for the process, which includes John Thompson, the board’s lead independent director, and includes Chairman of the Board Bill Gates, Chairman of the Audit Committee Chuck Noski and Chairman of the Compensation Committee Steve Luczo.

“The board is committed to the effective transformation of Microsoft to a successful devices and services company,” Thompson said. “As this work continues, we are focused on selecting a new CEO to work with the company’s senior leadership team to chart the company’s course and execute on it in a highly competitive industry.”

“As a member of the succession planning committee, I’ll work closely with the other members of the board to identify a great new CEO,” said Gates. “We’re fortunate to have Steve in his role until the new CEO assumes these duties.”



steve ballmermicrosoftbill gates





Latest Comments
greazy
Posted 10:13am 24/8/13
leading Microsoft through the next steps of its transformation to a devices and services company that empowers people for the activities they value most.
This line reads like an advert.
E.T.
Posted 10:13am 24/8/13
I'll be sure to keep an eye on Seek for the job ad :)
parabol
Posted 10:42am 24/8/13
Is it just me or did share prices suddenly go up?

Excellent news anyhow, here's hoping MS stops their trend of ridiculously stupid design/product decisions over the last few years.

trog
Posted 01:20pm 24/8/13
Is it just me or did share prices suddenly go up?
I saw some people say 8.5%-10%, although there was some speculation that there was also some partial effect from a NASDAQ outage that stopped trading or something. Still, pretty funny.
TicMan
Posted 01:37pm 24/8/13
Hanselman for CEO!
Nukleuz
Posted 01:56pm 24/8/13
Jobs for MS... never mind.
PeterThePossumMan
Posted 02:34pm 24/8/13
MS share price did rise but it won't last for long. MS is dying off, changing the CEO won't change much. It's finally paying for its lack of innovating and when they finally realized they had to innovate it was a big rush, so they ended up with their crappy tablets which has been a massive failure.

I am waiting for the MS share price to drop to $15 again to buy in.
parabol
Posted 02:35pm 24/8/13
I am waiting for the MS share price to drop to $15 again to buy in.

Why would you buy in if, as you say, "MS is dying off" ?
sLaps_Forehead
Posted 03:09pm 24/8/13
Wow that vid of Ballmer chanting is Tom Cruise Crazy.
Dodgymon
Posted 10:02pm 24/8/13
I have to say MS is actually starting to piss me off as company in the last year or so. I expect this will only get worse with a new CEO.
Whereas previously for a monopoly I actually quite liked the way they did things.

But now the things that have left a sour taste in my mouth are :-
MS Office is becoming more and more expesive whereas the OS is getting cheaper and cheaper. In recent years you could buy a copy of office 2010 where it be either pro or adademic or home and student and it coule be activated on 3 computers for less than $300 or less than $100 per pc.

Now Pro is like $500 and you can only actiuvate it on 1 pc.

Compare that to the Operating system where it used to cost upwards of $150 for Home premium and now it's around the $100 per pc.

Then there is windows 8 forced metro start menu

Then there is the cancellation of technet.

MS is seriously starting to blow chunks and if they don't start fixing up there stuff I hope they start seeing the reprocusions much like EA is now and they start shedding customers.
trillion
Posted 10:08pm 24/8/13
In what ways have the Surface/Xbox One been bad design decisions?

koopz
Posted 11:19pm 24/8/13
Whereas previously for a monopoly I actually quite liked the way they did things.



nothing wrong with a monopoly - so long as the economy is doing well enough for the rest of us not to care or notice


but here we are...


I ran into someone who's kid goes to Sommerville House School the other day... I was uber impressed with how they lay out their IBM lappies for their girls.


Windows running on top of a Ubuntu base OS.. it's so obvious now that a kids could do it.. yet it was the first time I've seen a higher end school implement the tech in that platform... most other schools are going cheap and doing nothing at all - or a tablet.

Eorl
Posted 11:02am 25/8/13
Dodgy, you can buy Office 365 for $119 for a year, and get up to five computers activated. Also trillion, I wouldn't say Surface or Xbox One are badly designed, but Surface could have had a bigger impact if the pricing was right to begin with.
Hogfather
Posted 01:12am 26/8/13
He's basically been sacked because of the 900M Surface RT write-down.

RT was a terrible idea and hope they've learned all the associated lessons.
Dodgymon
Posted 02:41am 26/8/13
How is $119 per year a good deal when you used to be able to buy it for less than that and have it forever?
trog
Posted 09:48am 26/8/13
He's basically been sacked because of the 900M Surface RT write-down.RT was a terrible idea and hope they've learned all the associated lessons.
I cannot belieeeeeeeeeeeeeve how bad the RT thing was. I haven't spoken to any civilians that were screwed by getting RT only to find their s*** didn't work as expected ("but it's Windows!") because, frankly, I've seen almost noone with a Surface tablet ever.

I have however read some really positive comments from people with the Surface Pro.
In what ways have the Surface/Xbox One been bad design decisions?
I dunno about the Xbox One, but I've read some comments from "analysts" that "Xbox" as a product within Microsoft has never been profitable. I haven't really seen anything conclusive - the numbers are hard because it's part of their Entertainment and Devices group, and it's not clear that they're taking the benefits of the whole Xbox ecosystem into account - but certainly there's pressure from MS to split that off into a different entity (there was even idle speculation that they might want to sell it off, but all this analyst s*** never seems to be worth the HTML it's written in).
Dazhel
Posted 10:28am 26/8/13
In what ways have the Surface/Xbox One been bad design decisions?


Microsoft's tech and design decisions over the last 5 years haven't been all that bad. The transitions to the WinRT platform through Silverlight/WPF & Windows Phone 7 -> Windows Phone 8 were a little rocky though.

Their marketing and communications strategists need to be all lined up and shot though.
Infidel
Posted 03:58am 27/8/13
They do make the bulk of their money in enterprise, would be cool to see the day where companies stop investing in this stuff and just require all applications to be web based or whatever and do away with having a client that requires windows
Eorl
Posted 07:54am 27/8/13
How is $119 per year a good deal when you used to be able to buy it for less than that and have it forever?

True, it is ridiculously priced (why I haven't even bothered and just went straight to Open Office) but I was just pointing out that you now get five activations instead of needing to pay for more after the first.
Commenting has been locked for this item.
19 Comments
Show