Adding to our list of platform-diverse reviews today, comes industry stalwart and Nintendo posterchild, Mario, in Super Mario 3D World for the Wii U. The gaming world might be abuzz about next-gen, but it's hard to ignore any Mario videogame formula, which is exactly what's on offer here.
We gave the review to birthday boy James "Jickle" O'Connor, who ran Mario and co. through their colourful, mushroom-powered paces and walked away satisfied, but slightly disappointed at the lack of true innovation in what should have been a real push for the Wii U's continued existence.
Click here for our
Super Mario 3D World review.
Posted 01:50pm 03/12/13
Posted 01:57pm 03/12/13
Posted 02:05pm 03/12/13
Posted 02:23pm 03/12/13
Then I played another game with my partner and it was totally different, we took our time to get all the stars and it was more cooperative then competitive. Both were really different ways to play what was essentially the same game.
It's not perfect, but for this style of game I think it's better than an 8.0. Multiplayer works soo much better than in the New Super Mario Bros games which were just a bit too frustrating.
Posted 02:26pm 03/12/13
I want to poke you in the eye, sir!
Posted 02:37pm 03/12/13
Big mention to the Miiverse implementation. It's brilliant. Stamps are going to give this game a lot of replayability. Also loving the toad mini-games with the 5 stars. One of the few sequels that out does the first game in EVERY way. I'm hoping the "extra worlds" are like 3D Land. I rage quit on those levels a few times haha.
Posted 03:00pm 03/12/13
There are, and they're amazing. Simultaneously incredibly fun and difficult.
Posted 03:15pm 03/12/13
Posted 05:14pm 03/12/13
when you give a game an 8 and you still get comments like this it's probably time to realise your scoring system is retarded.
Posted 06:42pm 03/12/13
I have to agree, it feels like score compression - where the used rating range is 7 to 10 instead of 0 to 10 - is in full effect for AusGamers reviews recently
Posted 07:01pm 03/12/13
Posted 07:45pm 03/12/13
yes but on this website a 7.9 means you can play it all the way through without some glaring issues that could be sorted out in alpha and 9.9 is call of duty
Posted 08:26pm 03/12/13
Posted 09:15pm 03/12/13
Posted 10:08pm 03/12/13
The point here is, you guys love the game enough to not be happy with our score, if you hated the game and it scored the same, we'd be in the same boat. Review scores are for those seeking them, but if you already have the game and don't need the score, it shouldn't be a personal issue. An 8, to me, is a game I should definitely play. I just scored Dead Rising 3 7.9 but couldn't stop talking about how great it is, because 7.9 is still playable. This isn't the IGN review score realm of 8-10. (And yes, I know you're all going to go through our reviews and cherrypick the games you think are too high or too low, but that will just solidify my point.)
Posted 10:10pm 03/12/13
Posted 10:48pm 03/12/13
HahahahahahahahaahhaahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahH
*Wipes away tears*
Some people absolutely love a game, while others hate it. A review is from one persons view point. I like to read reviews to see pros and cons and try to ignore the score.
A lot of movies I've thoroughly enjoyed have been blasted by critics as bad. The same thing will happen with games. Use reviews as a guide, not as a "THIS GAME IS BAD FOR ME, SO IS BAD FOR EVERYONE" Type thing.
3/10
Posted 01:25am 04/12/13
When is the first time you remember people complaining about review scores?
Loving me some Mario 3D world, feels like the game NSMB WiiU shouldve been.
Good review too, nice to hear a different perspective.