The Feminist Frequency team has debuted the first instalment in their Tropes vs Women documentary video series, investigating the history of the use of the damsel in distress device in video games.
The video series was funded by a wildly successful Kickstarter crowdfunding campaign, and plans to touch on twelve recurring tropes that have burdened the portrayal of female characters in videogames over the years.
Following Damsel in Distress, the following videos are expected to discuss: The Fighting F#@k Toy, The Sexy Sidekick, The Sexy Villainess, Background Decoration, Voodoo Priestess/Tribal Sorceress, Women as Reward - Video, Mrs. Male Character, Unattractive Equals Evil, Man with Boobs, Positive Female Characters!, and Top 10 Most Common Defenses of Sexism in Games.
I thought that she started off with a very strong point, but then spent seemingly infinite time (or, entire minutes) talking about mythology and old movies/cartoons.
edit: Watched a bit further. The recurring peach example is a bit flawed, as Nintendo just basically repeats the same game for decades in all of their franchises (same with every pokemon game, same formula of 3 starters from a professor, 8 badges, elite 4, rival, champion), same with pikachu getting kidnapped every episode due to lack of imagination by the writers (and pikachu is a he, and a hero). Peach is barely even on screen, and is just part of their crazy non-evolving essentially random crazy s*** world (whereas you can play as her as a hero in the other games). I haven't played metroid, but don't get the impression that the female character, when a lead, is shown as weak.
She is so liberated, not conforming to the traditional mind-set of women who romanticised about being "saved by Prince Charming". Yeah babe, your own sex is half to blame about this stereotypical plot device, as are those earrings!
But to be serious for a moment there was an enlightening story on Good Game the other day about racism in video games. Most of the points had never crossed my mind before (just like the racism in Loony Tunes cartoons as I was growing up), but one of the people interviewed was a games developer who had this most poignant point: "We create games that we want to play ourselves. The industry is mainly white males and the content reflects this."
Now before condemning the industry for its apparent selectivity in its employment you have to look at the number of non-white males or females of any race who have career goals to become games developers. "Racism" and "sexism" as a matter of exclusion isn't intentional, it is merely the result of who wants to make these games,
Instead of b****ing about something in a You Tube video make the effort to get involved in the creative process. Feminists and racial-rights supporters spend too much time complaining and not doing. Also disabling comments in your You Tube video makes you look intentionally ignorant.
Pfft, can't comment on the video, can't send a message to the channel. They're living in a closed world constantly reinforcing their sexist views. I cannot respect anyone who refuses criticism, although I will admit that they would get a lot that is nonconstructive.
Pfft, can't comment on the video, can't send a message to the channel. They're living in a closed world constantly reinforcing their sexist views. I cannot respect anyone who refuses criticism, although I will admit that they would get a lot that is nonconstructive.
+1
Ratings disabled + comments disabled means the user knows they have no legs to stand on and would get torn apart by criticism.
She consistently receives violent vitriol and threats. Her comment pages are often littered with direct threats. Her TED talk's comments were disallowed by youtube because of the nature of the comments. There are plenty of ways to engage Anita in a debate, but I believe she didn't want to detract from her presentation and point. I don't think she's disagree that women consciously or unconsciously feed and support damsel tropes. She's not accusing any one person of sexism or misogyny, just pointing out trends in a specific medium. She herself states that you can enjoy the media while commenting on it. Whose to say she's not involved with changing the demographics of participation in video design. I think it is all too easy to say there is no interest outside of while male gamer. Perhaps it is a cyclical thing. They produce games for their own self-reflective demographic and therefore generate no interest outside said demographic. Also completely independently launching and creating games is rather difficult so why not break with the laziness of an expected template and try something else.
Yeah you'd be pretty surprised by the 'men's rights' douchebags who turn up on on these things, and the s*** that they spew.
I don't agree with some of what I saw in the video (peach as mentioned above), but know that comments basically have to be disabled if somebody wants to be able to retain their faith in humanity after posting anything on this topic.
I don't blame them for disabling comments; my favourite plugin for Firefox is CommentBlocker. I've told it to block every comment on YouTube, news sites, you name it. If I could get it to selectively block certain users on forums I'd donate more money to the people who wrote it.
Oh noes, teh bad comments, they offend me. So? Part of sharing your opinion on the internet means others get to share theirs (no matter what it is). One sided argument much?
I find you have to be careful of blatant and hidden misandry in some of these feminists, though to be fair it's a understandable over-balance in the fight against male dominated sexism.
I'd be interested to see her creds/beliefs and previous work, to ensure she's not another Hanna Rosin, aka 'The End of Men'. Those kind of feminists actually detriment women I think.
Well that was half an hour of my life I'm never getting back.
Good philosophy involves not just stating your point of view and cherry-picking examples to support it. You also need to present potential criticisms of your theory and do your best to refute them. This on the other hand was an amazingly bland and boring monologue, with virtually zero actual analytical value. Surprisingly light on the research as well, considering she asked for and received thousands of dollars to produce it.
Plenty of people are writing and speaking about sexism in our society. A lot of what they have to say is cogent, salient and informative. This isn't one of those people.
Oh noes, teh bad comments, they offend me. So? Part of sharing your opinion on the internet means others get to share theirs (no matter what it is). One sided argument much?
People can still share their opinions though. The comments section of the video is just one place on the entire goddamn internet (it's only one place on Youtube too, expect videos criticising this video in the next few days). There's a difference between not giving someone a soapbox to stand on and censorship.
I hope the people that contributed to the kickstarted felt they got their moneys worth.
These sort of arguments are almost always unreasonable. She might not like the story archetype of Damsel in Distress but it works and has been working for thousands of years. You can't tell a story without casting something in a negative light from someones perspective, if you did it would be the worlds most boring story.
I think she is taking the wrong tact. Instead of complaining that men like to play fantasy characters where they get to be the hero and save the girl she should be complaining that there aren't enough games where the girl gets to be the hero and saves the guy.
I got about as far into the video as when she came on screen wearing those f*****g huge earrings.What a bad start for a person wanting to be taken seriously on the topic of feminism ...(unless she's being satirical in some way, not that i'd know not being able to get through the video)
Imagine if you got on TV and claimed that bogans are stereotyped too much in media, while you're in a singlet holding a beer and sporting a massive rat-tail ...
Her complaint was about females being stereotyped as helpless or possessions, what have earrings got to do with that?
Yeah she's right. Like, a lot of the girls I know have never played games, but they keep asking me to save them from c***roaches, spiders and unopened sauce bottles, but they're definitely NOT my possessions.
This is super cereal guys, let's do something about it so that we can tell future generations that we really made a difference.
There's no denying that our pop culture has inherited a biased treatment of female characters.
That is a pretty poor and hypocritical example right there. The WoW one fits but the other one contains impossibly buff guys, I mean s***, even the tin man looks like he works out. Characterization is about exaggerating features, you can't complain about women with accentuated hips and boobs when the men are running around with impossibly bulging muscles and broad shoulders.
Armor in fantasy RPG's is probably the only real gripe I think feminists can truly have in terms of games. Complaining about things like the women in DoA is silly because they are not targeted towards women in even the slightest, they are there to fulfill the fantasies of horny teenage boys.
The reason fantasy armor is an issue is because it isn't the reason people play those games and it can exclude people from being able to create the character they want. Let me be clear, I think it's ok to have skimpy armour, games are a fantasy not a reality and not all women want there character to wear modest clothing, but when a game only has one extreme it is a problem.
force the left wing nutcases to legislate games no one wants to play.
let's do something about it so that we can tell future generations that we really made a difference.
All the straw men will have a joyous time doing more than the analytical criticism seen here, I'm sure.
you can't complain about women with accentuated hips and boobs when the men are running around with impossibly bulging muscles and broad shoulders.
I don't disagree (SWTOR comes to mind), however the highlighted issue there was the 'protective' armour, not the form of the bodies, which are both idealized (I have no problem with idealization).
The criticism was (well, one of the two) that females are reduced to objects more than people, in a great deal of or majority of gaming media. I think that we are agreeing that this is correct? Because her reasoning for this being a negative thing (from what I saw of skipping through the video) was that this (theoretically) leads to (or reinforces) the unequal gender views which we've inherited since the old testament days (from the time when the bible described how much you could sell your daughter for, and how she must marry her rapist, and so on). Her criticism wasn't that it doesn't match the likely audience's desires, I think that she even did touch on that.
Personally, I'd like to see supporting data, as I've played plenty of female objectifying and violent games, and yet don't seem to exhibit any tendencies of thinking those ways. I would prefer if one gender wasn't continuously uniquely objectified, as it makes my geeky female friends uncomfortable, which makes me feel uncomfortable when I see it now. Sexually objectify both I say.
Yeah I said you had a point with the WoW characters, I disagreed with the Avenger example proving anything though which is why I commented on exaggerated forms, that's all.
Pro tip: massive earrings help to gain attention, stereotype a gender, and cause a conflict of integrity during a discussion about not wanting to be treated like an object.
Why would feminine stereotypical clothes be objectifying, unless you've started out with an objectifying attitude about femininity in the first place?
On the Avengers example, women generally find the chest, biceps and front super attractive parts of a males body, no? Whereas men find the breasts and arse super attractive, so the original Avengers poster is sort of serving both audiences.
I'd say the armour/clothing argument for fantasy games could be valid, but these are games targeted at a particular audience, men. It's no different to other things or mediums targeted at a female audience that have overly ripped men and/or in skimpy clothes. I'd cite the Magic Mike movie for example here.
It happens on both sides, so it does seem a bit hypocritical.
Really large hoop earrings? They're not drawing much visual or sexual attention. Also, why is the standard default to disagreeing with a woman always result in commenting on her appearance and not her argument>
On the Avengers example, women generally find the chest, biceps and front super attractive parts of a males body, no? Whereas men find the breasts and arse super attractive, so the original Avengers poster is sort of serving both audiences.
I've known a lot of ass-girls, but the more important point is that Scarlett isn't even doing anything except turning to show butt and sideboob, whereas everybody else is.
Google images search The Hawkeye Initiative (though I think that the Mary Jane one is a stretch) and you will never be able to unsee it in pop culture imagery again.
Again, I don't mind sexualisation, I love it, but her point was that its persistent uniqueness to one gender (in regular storytelling and not porn) possibly reinforces, on a mass scale, the objectifying views of women in society. That it makes my female friends uncomfortable (who otherwise love these things), is what makes it uncomfortable for me, I'd rather that the industry move to not constantly reducing one gender to tits and ass. Do it for both genders, or save it for porn.
- Alice: Madness Returns - Tomb Raider - StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty (refresher replay) - World of WarCraft (main is a female undead warlock)
First two have strong female protagonists, the third has a strong female antagonist (I'll excuse the ending, since the "helplessness" is short-lived with the sequel). The only wouldbe 'negative' would be that the first three characters are sexualised to some degree (appearance/art). But that's a pretty long bow to draw.
I guess my point is..uh...yeah - females in games, don't need guys to bail them out.
I think the aspect of objectifying women is actually far more prevalent in Hollywood in general, then video games. If anything video games is probably doing a bit better now with recent examples.
Why would feminine stereotypical clothes be objectifying
You just answered your own question.
So big earrings remind you of femininity via stereotypes, and you're... saying that you can't take her seriously while she's still reminding you of femininity, because she should expect to be objectified while she reminds you of the very idea of female?
I think that you've proved their larger point without even realising it. Sad lawl. :/
"Pft, society doesn't objectify females" "BTW don't be female-like if you don't want to be objectified".
I think the aspect of objectifying women is actually far more prevalent in Hollywood in general, then video games. If anything video games is probably doing a bit better now with recent examples.
Yeah, agreed. She had some good points, but games have a lot of strong cases scattered about, and some of the ones she mentioned weren't very good.
People can still share their opinions though. The comments section of the video is just one place on the entire goddamn internet (it's only one place on Youtube too, expect videos criticising this video in the next few days). There's a difference between not giving someone a soapbox to stand on and censorship.
And chances are she won't bother reading any comments anywhere, or watching the videos that tear her arguments to bits because {insert whatever insecurity here}. There's plenty of girls on youtube who speak their mind and don't get death threats, if you have to resort to just disabling comments then maybe you should take a look at what you're putting up. Is it blatantly offensive? Are you just plain wrong? Sort of reminds me of a child who puts their fingers in their ears and screams la la la la la when you tell them they're doing something wrong.
Meanwhile we're all currently playing as an insanely strong female character that doesn't seem to ever die (unless confronted with twigs).Why does this person even exist?/threadP.S. Video has such a strong tone of smug it might meet with George Clooney's and create a perfect storm of self satisfaction.
But don't you see? Tomb raider is just one game man, there's hundreds of thousands of sexist games out there. Oh the humanity.
Really large hoop earrings? They're not drawing much visual or sexual attention. Also, why is the standard default to disagreeing with a woman always result in commenting on her appearance and not her argument>
Have to maybe kind of sort of agree with this (whoever "steph" is). Body piercings of all kinds of weird nature go on all over the world in women and men. Who gives a s*** what kind of earrings she wears (unless they're made of actual human body parts, then we should worry). On a more "constructive criticism" note, anything that moves or dangles or jingles can be a distraction in a video and if wanting to be taken seriously should be kept to a minimum for simplicity sake if you ask me (which no one ever does).
in before why is there no female characters in battlefield 3
But why ARE there no more female models in general games? There was in some previous games (like quake 2, unreal tournament, etc).
Speaking of women, what does everyone see as my avatar? A girl with glasses? I tried to change it but no matter what I upload, it always ends up being the girl with glasses (on my computer anyway). Either avatar uploads are broke, or zomg sexist forumzzz
Clearly the whole thing is just an act and she just wanted the Kickstarter money to buy a WiiU and the latest Super Mario Bros since she's such a massive fan of the series. Well played young lady.
that video was f*****g boring, but reading the titles of the episodes i'd be interested in a more palatable presentation of the ideas because
female characters in video games are f*****g boring male nerd fantasies with zero personality. i'm sure there's five good examples that counter this sentiment but it is far and away in the majority. anything that fixes this is a good thing.
parabol, your comment on her hoop earrings is genuinely f*****g crazy. i'm not nerf lord, i won't type long comments trying to explain to your retarded psyche why what you said was f*****g crazy, but believe me, i'm right.
there is no mention of marketing being the reason for the sexist stereotypes in games or whatever. but surely that is the reason... the game developers knew their audience would be largely young males & tailored the games to suit.
if there is now a market for games tailored more towards female players then i am sure developers would do whatever to capture those dollars... perhaps some empowered female developers could make this game! ;)
there is no mention of marketing being the reason for the sexist stereotypes in games or whatever. but surely that is the reason... the game developers knew their audience would be largely young males & tailored the games to suit.
I would suggest that interactive story telling is still relatively young. Therefore the basic stories we can compelling make interactive are the ones we know the ass out of, such as the damsel in distress.
I don't know I guess she make valid points. Though I would point out to Nerf Lord that the 'lazy writer' doesn't really cut it as an excuse. Mario and Peach have had the same relationship for a quarter of century now. F*** Yahtzee routinely points out that peach is not really useful for anything other than getting kidnapped. It would be totally trivial write a story where she is not an object to be retrieved.
I think the aspect of objectifying women is actually far more prevalent in Hollywood in general, then video games. If anything video games is probably doing a bit better now with recent examples.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with objectifying anything in works of fiction. Quite often on this forum people get riled up when the news try to blame games for the worlds problems, claiming that video games objectify women and that is a bad thing that will cause men to see women as property is just as ridiculous as claiming GTA made me kill a large number of pedestrians.
Besides, in most cases of women being objectified it's not about the woman but other things that a woman can be used to represent. It's usually women representing a fantasy for male sexual desire which makes women uncomfortable and personally I think that's the fault of a prudish western civilization making people believe that sex is somehow wrong. How else are they meant to represent that in a work of fiction? A picture of a lubed up hand?
Saying that men are bad because they like to fantasize about being a hero and saving the girl is ridiculous, saying that an entertainment industry shouldn't facilitate that fantasy is equally ridiculous. Feminism is, or should be, about equal opportunity not this whinging about women being objectified in completely voluntary games. Take Mario for example, no s*** Peach gets kidnapped in every game, who the f*** plays Mario expecting something different? It's not like they lied to you about it and tricked you into playing. Don't like it, don't play them, if enough people feel the same way then they will change the way they make games to suit the markets desires.
I agree with the gist of what deadlyf said, well played sir.
It's all stupendously ridiculous when considered in context to what fiction is and what actual gender equality is. As I said earlier, these kinds of things don't help womens rights.
She's outright wrong with Princess Peach, she's a playable character in SMB2 and then never again? Lets ignore the Mario Kart Series, Mario Golf Series, Super Smash Bros Melee and Brawl, Super Paper Mario, etc, etc...
She's outright wrong with Princess Peach, she's a playable character in SMB2 and then never again? Lets ignore the Mario Kart Series, Mario Golf Series, Super Smash Bros Melee and Brawl, Super Paper Mario, etc, etc...
She says core franchise, and mentions these others (and then stupidly suggests that peach should have her own game in the core franchise - not understanding that mario saving peach is one of the checkboxes to determine whether it is a core game).
Both genders are being treated like objects - Every dude in a video game is a massive grunt with huge shoulders and V chests, every chick is heavily armored bikini model. They're both pathetic stereotypes.
You're talking about exaggerated heroism on the dudes, not possession'ifying and constantly reinforcing the idea of being weak, which seems to be the criticism here.
Lara Croft's reboot has got to be one of the most empowering, kickass female protagonists in recent memory. Especially when you consider how far the reboot has taken the character away from her "tits and arse" roots.
Nerf, I'm talking about the pictures you posted. Posing the guys with their butts waving everywhere is overlooking the fact that the exaggerated bodies of the male protagonists are just as damaging to young male minds as the female equivalent, but it's a fact that goes largely ignored by society.
Both genders are being treated like objects - Every dude in a video game is a massive grunt with huge shoulders and V chests, every chick is heavily armored bikini model. They're both pathetic stereotypes.
Nerf, I'm talking about the pictures you posted. Posing the guys with their butts waving everywhere is overlooking the fact that the exaggerated bodies of the male protagonists are just as damaging to young male minds as the female equivalent, but it's a fact that goes largely ignored by society.
Again, both genders are idealized, but the women are frequently reduced to nothing but sex pose toys, whereas the guys aren't.
I don't know whether I'd agree that it necessarily encourages harmful thinking, but the described situation is very true.
I don't know whether I'd agree that it necessarily encourages harmful thinking
This is all going to sound pretty glib, but to me it seems like the the root cause of the problem. Shooters are mostly played by guys. Subsequently the characters are male, and in order to fit their role they are generally made to be the most powerful character in the game. Its the stereotypical male fantasy, and they give it to the players because thats what they want, at least as far as sales data indicates.
Now what does every virile male need to complete their power fantasy? A hot piece of arm candy, right? Hence the neverending parade of complacent female characters.
Effectively solving this problem seems to me mostly a matter of changing the perception of what a normal male character in a game should be. The sexism targeting females is part of the exact same sexism that compartmentalises the gender roles. Drop the unrealistic grunts and the half naked companions should fall by the wayside soon after. Whether or not this is possible, I can't say. I am certainly offended by characters like Marcus Fenix. I grew up loving characters like Roger Wilco and Guybrush Threepwood, not the musclebound douchebag action heroes that seem to permeate today's market.
I'm not even convinced that its a problem that needs solving. The market is generally a pretty good indicator of people's desires, and if there was a large market for smart female characters, there would likely be games out there to cash in on that. Maybe it's just a function of guys that they're inevitably going to go for lowest common denominator s*** at some point. Other media is full of such examples - romance and action are both genres that have a very big gender split, and the characters function in certain ways as a result. Is there anything wrong with that? Perhaps if women played more shooters and less Farmville we might see some different characters in our games. Perhaps people just kinda suck.
you know what, f*** the diesel powered lesbians trying to f*** something else up that they should just stay out of.
wheres the man-inest outcry when hard core porn stories are on front and centre display in every k mart, book store, talked about on morning shows about some sloot, slooting it up all over the place.
yeah, there was none. but thats alright for the 'repressed' gender.
true fact, these 2 diesel powered lesbians were arguing about women being objectified in video games, classed as the sexualised fantasies of evil males and they ain't too happy about it. they sourced some free cash from kickstarter from a bunch of like minded lemmings and neutered males to go and tell the world all about it. GIRL POWAH
A girl talks about tropes regarding the female gender in video games, gets called a "diesel powered lesbian", person isn't put into special needs zoo. Fascinating.
the fact the idiots even gave her money to do this s*** is a joke. were you one nerf ? were you interested in this fascinating take on the history of video games ?
I'd like to hear cainer's thoughts on how the Jews steal our money through their Zionist occupied governments, and use the black man to bring drugs into our oppressed white minority communities.
I'm not even sure I understood what the hell cainer even said in his second last post (one with the video).
I do sort of find it a waste of crowd funding to go out and get a kickstarter to dress like a lumberjack (is her dressing like a man deliberate?) and sit in front of a camera for an hour putting picture-in-picture views of games beside you.
I mean seriously, how much does a video camera cost? You can pick them up for a couple of hundred bucks (because as if you need 1080p for youtube), a laptop for about a grand (lets say a half decent-ish one) and some video editing software (don't know how much that s*** costs). There's no way all of that equals $100k+ or whatever they got. You don't need an entire film crew to do this kind of thing.
I'm 99% sure that she's not talking about muscular strength.
I'm not even sure I understood what the hell cainer even said in his second last post (one with the video).
Given his earlier rant about lesbians destroying family values, mockery of women's choices in sex, etc, it's a rabbit hole which no sane human will return from after going down...
The contextual situations of the video game examples she reference almost all relate to physical strength.
What does she take issue with, the trope or the fact that video games are using the trope? Both? Why isn't she taking it up with other forms of entertainment media, or the writing source of tropes?
It's all a bit misinformed and misdirected really, and tbh those hoop earrings are massive, shes probably wearing them especially for negative comment.
The contextual situations of the video game examples she reference almost all relate to physical strength.
I think that she was talking about the examples where the female simply cries "help me" and gets helplessly kidnapped every time, never more than a weak pathetic lamb. (hence the "damsel in distress" title).
I do sort of find it a waste of crowd funding to go out and get a kickstarter to dress like a lumberjack (is her dressing like a man deliberate?)
You have to be trolling? She wore a non-revealing flannel shirt, obviously fitted for a woman's frame, and that's "dressing like a man" ?
I think the 100K+ would be better spent getting strong female narratives/tropes coming out of writing sources, and into places like Hollywood and other entertainment media, that would help to change the status-quo and video games would probably follow suit.
Video games in some respects are still a niche industry comparable to the market, you don't change something like that from a niche.
Those videos clearly don't take 100K to make, we've made better ones at work for client testimonials for under £1K. What a rip off.
Looking through the list of backers, it seems that there were a lot of girls wanting this to get made.
The huge amount is just showing that there's obviously a demand for it. People will put in way more than what a project necessarily needs - check out what the SMBC guy ended up on for a package of his comics, which are already available online for free.
I don't think I can watch this. I don't think i will. Just apply the same standards that you think a scientist does reading a journal article. Ask questions like:
Does the author reference? Are the references from a credible source? Are the conclusions logical and clear? What are limits of the study? Any conflict of interest? Is the author credible or a blogger with no formal education, is claiming expertise on a subject when others are more suited, given a wide audience and a platform to voice their opinion?
I would like to quote Urthboy - Hellsong lyrics because there are better ways to spend 100k than on youtube videos:
We’ll be joined by agnostic and atheists And loop cuckoo cults across the Earth’s radius The brightest of the bright will be coupled with the shadiest Workaholics condemned to pens with the laziest The passive and the ropable, no hoper and the Notable, forgettable and uh, the quotable The centre of attention to barely audible Not even any privileges for the laudable What Ben Lee meant, with we’re all in this together On the high road to hell we’re birds of a feather Nothing can unite us like endeavours to the nether Bureaucrats lobbying Lucifer with a letter I swear that Satan will get sick of it quick Leavin the evilest of evil even thinking to quit To the tune of Kenny G playin saxophone licks Thinking hell has really gone to ish
According to the people The people that resemble Disciples of the temple
We’re all going to hell We’re all going to hell We’re all going to hell We’re all going to hell
Her stated cost wasn't 100k, that's what she received.Looking through the list of backers, it seems that there were a lot of girls wanting this to get made.The huge amount is just showing that there's obviously a demand for it. People will put in way more than what a project necessarily needs - check out what the SMBC guy ended up on for a package of his comics, which are already available online for free.
But the fact remains that she DID receive over 100 grand. If you got THAT much money, you'd want to make sure you did a damn good job of it rather than just sitting in front of a camera for 40 minutes. You'd want to get your lazy fat ass (I know she's not actually fat) out onto the street with a proper damn film crew and actually interview real people and get their opinion on the matter and have an independent editor edit it all together so as not to introduce any bias she might have into the final piece (I don't actually know who edits it).
I don't take issue with the fact that she GOT that much money, I do think she should feel quite bad about the level of quality she's delivering though, for the amount she did get.
I guess we'll have to keep staring at this trainwreck for the duration to see if the other parts are any better. For 100k though, I'd at least turn a room into a temporary studio and get guests in to interview or walk around on the street with a crew interviewing random people to see whether they shared the same opinion.
What about throwing in the myriad of literary and psychological studies/research from legitimate professionals about sexism, gender equality, and the history of sexist plot devices in entertainment, or mainstream media?
That's the real root cause, video games are just a symptom, one of many.
You could defo spend 100K on that kind of stuff and then it'd pass greazy's very valid question list, it'd also be taken a lot more seriously too.
Meh, from glancing through the kickstarter page, it looks like she already had a video series and was only ever planning to do more of the same, and did spend stretch goals on higher production qualities (wearable microphones, lighting, production software, etc).
I didn't agree with half the video, but I'm pretty skeptical of those with the relentless constantly-readjusting criticism tbh.
you do realise that normal people readjust arguments when presented with new facts or points of view that make sense to them right? and that that's a good thing?
Heh Door, sticking up for "normal people". I meant there are people repeatedly coming back to freshly attack it from every angle that they can muster, only because they were already set against it. People who go apes*** over discussion of female tropes in games are unfortunately a constant presence.
People who go apes*** over discussion of female tropes in games are unfortunately a constant presence.
Someone should promise a shoddy thrown together video series about male tropes in games, throw it up on kickstarter and then see how much they can pocket from the 150K difference.
Heh Door, sticking up for "normal people". I meant there are people repeatedly coming back to freshly attack it from every angle that they can muster, only because they were already set against it. People who go apes*** over discussion of female tropes in games are unfortunately a constant presence.
Think it's becoming ever-clearer that she's a bit of a crackpot, I feel sorry for the investors and women on a whole, these kind of incorrect feminists don't help the cause of gender equality.
She comes across as more of a pseudo-intellectual than a crackpot. Gender representation within games is an interesting topic, the people that contributed to the kickstarter deserve so much better than what Sarkeesian can provide them with.
I don't know if anybody's said that it should be immune, I mean I have a few criticisms of it, it's just that this topic brings out some major denialist d***wads, who toss and turn through every criticism that they can.
she's over analyzing 'games' to form an opinion to suit an agenda that leads to her getting a buttload of cash.
games are made for a market, there was no over riding plot/plan/scheme to create these 'tropes' for the sole purpose of subjugating women as objects to create social dominance over them. its a simple formula that sells. its 1 segment - she's a nutjob, and you're a whiteknight defending the honor of a diesel powered lesbian trying to justify her massive kickstarter payday. girl power
Jake R 1 minute ago
Anita's views are actually enlightening to understanding Feminism. For millenia males did the dirty, dangerous jobs like hunting, warring, mining, lumbering, etc, while the women stayed home. The Western opinion is that the women safe at home in these circumstances were "oppressed". In bizzaro feminist logic this protection from war, injury, and death was "objectification". ...It's like they're trolling us. Trying to see how insane they can get before being checked.
Jake R 1 minute ago Anita's views are actually enlightening to understanding Feminism. For millenia males did the dirty, dangerous jobs like hunting, warring, mining, lumbering, etc, while the women stayed home. The Western opinion is that the women safe at home in these circumstances were "oppressed". In bizzaro feminist logic this protection from war, injury, and death was "objectification". ...It's like they're trolling us. Trying to see how insane they can get before being checked.
mra reddit.txt
cainer is living, drooling proof that things like this video are necessary. People as far gone as him are probably irredeemable, but people need to be aware that there are individuals out there who are just absolutely warped and steps need to be made to rectify it.
I'm as atheist as they come but I really do have to shake my head at the witchhunt against Thunderf00t by the FTB etc. It really does appear that there are some topics they simply don't allow thought on *even when it's damned obvious that their own position is NOT ipso facto correct.*
That rationalwiki post about him is some of the most biased posting I've seen on such wikis and really has no place on a site presumably dedicated to rational thinking.
The points Thunderf00t made in his response to that feminist while at times strongly ladled with sarcasm seemed to be somewhat *factually based* which is more than can be said for the woman he was responding to who was deliberately setting out to present the results from an intellectually dishonest study designed to meet a pre-determined outcome.
cainer is living, drooling proof that things like this video are necessary.
i would replace 'necessary' with 'understandable'. and then i would agree whole heartedly. i can understand how frustrating it must be for a woman to run into people like cainer and MRA reddit and think 'his insanity is accepted. i guess we should fight fire with fire'.
but there is no place for preaching s*** that is flat out wrong.
I don't know if anybody's said that it should be immune, I mean I have a few criticisms of it, it's just that this topic brings out some major denialist d***wads, who toss and turn through every criticism that they can.
Denialists are people who deny demonstrable facts. While I would agree that some peoples bias is showing in response to the video that does not make anything said within the video valid.
I'd be really interested to hear what parts of the video you agreed with.
cainer is living, drooling proof that things like this video are necessary.
Just because one thing is apparent, does not mean that another thing is also apparent. Cainer being a d******* doesn't validate the video in the OP.
Denialists are people who deny demonstrable facts.
The trope of unevenly reducing just one gender to weak & helpless or sexual object in games is well evidenced. She produced a number of examples in that video. Find a handful which are honestly comparable where a man is the helpless victim, showing up inexplicably wearing only boardshorts or bdsm gear or something when rescued.
I don't really see what was so controversial about that video in the OP apart from how much money the kickstarter made. Keep in mind she only asked for $6000 but $158,000 was provided, and that the video was only part one of a twelve part series. I doubt all the money will be spent on even that many videos and I wouldn't be surprised to see any surplus money donated to some organisation.
People are judging this video very harshly and accusing it of jumping to conclusions and things like that. I find this kind of ironic because making a judgement on everything this person has to say after she has only presented 1/12th of her material seems to me like people are jumping the gun a bit. The way I saw this video was pretty much as a bare-bones basic 101 of the history of the damsel in distress trope used in video games - that's it. Hopefully she will get in to some more meatier aspects as the series goes on, and I'll reserve my final judgement till I see part twelve.
The trope of unevenly reducing just one gender to weak & helpless or sexual object in games is well evidenced.
It's not even remotely well evidenced... even her examples didn't give evidence of sexual objectification. The concept that the Damsel is weak is deeply flawed, if she was weak then saving her would be trivial and the game would be over. It's a mechanism used to create a sense of peril by showing how dangerous the adversary is, not how weak women are.
She's interpreted it to suit her agenda, interpretations are not evidence or fact, they are opinions. Not only that but she uses a trope with thousands of years of time to have a negative impact on gender equality, and then talks about it from the view of an industry that is relatively new. Despite the relative newness of the games industry, it has come about in a time where women's rights are stronger than ever. She gives no evidence to back up the claim that it is having a negative impact in society.
Lets take the fictional concept and translate it to a situation based in reality.
A woman is over come by smoke in a house fire (because women are weak and can't breath in CO2, weaklings), and a fireman rescues her (male of course, everyone knows that women can never be firemen). Now the woman is sitting outside her house sucking on a canister of oxygen (when the fireman throws her over his shoulder and takes her back to his firecave to keep as his slave forever, the end), when the fireman, thinking she is quite the looker asks her out on a date (where she has absolutely no free choice to refuse), which she kindly declines because she isn't a fictional character with no free will of her own and despite all the fictional tropes in all the world she can make up her own mind (and the fireman was black and she's a racist).
'ists and 'isms have no place in telling fiction what it can and can't do. That's the Thought Police's job.
even her examples didn't give evidence of sexual objectification.
You didn't watch the video. The example of crystal was right at the very start, and then a montage of them later. As she said, "Subjects act, objects are acted upon."
The concept that the Damsel is weak is deeply flawed, if she was weak then saving her would be trivial and the game would be over. It's a mechanism used to create a sense of peril by showing how dangerous the adversary is, not how weak women are.
So why are the men able to defeat them? Why are the woman essentially never rescuing the men? Why do the woman simply cry for help as she pointed out? Why are the male protagonists always able to break themselves out of prison whenever they're captured in the same stories?
Her point wasn't that it sets out to make women look weak, but that it's a toxic meme which reinforces the notion which exists in our society.
She's interpreted it to suit her agenda
She reported a real situation for reasons that she deems important. Most all of my geeky female friends have expressed how uncomfortable they are made by these stereotypes. Now that I'm not blind to it, I'm made uncomfortable by it. My agenda is "stop making things which perpetuate s***** stereotypes", so sue me.
She gives no evidence to back up the claim that it is having a negative impact in society.
That's exactly what I said earlier. However you just admitted that it exists, after denying the whole situation. Her actual statement is not a particularly bold claim.
The trope of unevenly reducing just one gender to weak & helpless or sexual object in games is well evidenced. She produced a number of examples in that video. Find a handful which are honestly comparable where a man is the helpless victim, showing up inexplicably wearing only boardshorts or bdsm gear or something when rescued.
and then there is the trope that men are single minded violent thugs that only know how to solve problems with violence. incapable of reason, sexual lust machines, all they know how to do is fight and f***.
and nerf, men are stronger its a simple fact. women are protected in society from the dirty, dangerous, undesireable jobs. thats why generally there isn't women firefighters, garbage collectors, carpenters, shall i go on ?
and then there is the trope that men are single minded violent thugs that only know how to solve problems with violence. incapable of reason, sexual lust machines, all they know how to do is fight and f***.
If you think that this is a problem, then do something about it?
Personally I can't think of many games that really fit that profile, maybe arcade fighers. Mario, Link, Starfox, and so on - the ones out rescuing the incapable females - are not shown this way.
Even if were true though, how on earth would that lead to you calling her a "diesel powered lesbian", going on rants about family values, contraceptives, and so on?
and nerf, men are stronger its a simple fact.
It's already been discussed that physical strength wasn't what was being discussed. You're gunning your (thankfully now less insane) platform on an equivocation fallacy. But, given your earlier rant, perhaps you -really mean- mentally weaker, psychologically weaker, less competent, and are just proving her point.
no nerf, you can't just write in what you want me to write and say i wrote it.
If you think that this is a problem, then do something about it? Personally I can't think of many games that really fit that profile, maybe arcade fighers. Mario, Link, Starfox, and so on - the ones out rescuing the incapable females - are not shown this way.
firstly, i don't have a problem with it, its a f***en game. its stooping the low politically correct platform of having a sook about everything to push an unpopular agenda by making everyone else feel bad about it.
and secondly who said the 2 had to exist in tandem. damsels in distress don't exist in battlefield 3 or dayz or sega rally or tetris. gun toting killing machines incapable of thought exist in 2 of them. a lunatic driver with no regard for damaging nature exists in one of them. and some a******* obsessed with abstract depictions of phalluses exists in the last.
hey look i just overanaylzed something to suit an agenda. heap money and praise upon me. defend me oh whiteknights of the world for i am so oppressed for my lunatic views that i need to have a sook on TEDx(the nutjob version) about it. woe is me (give me money).
no nerf, you can't just write in what you want me to write and say i wrote it.
Huh? Are you denying the diesel powered lesbians, women thinking that they can just have sex when they want, destruction of family values spiel?
firstly, i don't have a problem with it
So why did you describe it as a negative thing?
its stooping the low politically correct platform of having a sook about everything to push an unpopular agenda by making everyone else feel bad about it.
It's obviously not unpopular, given the amount of funding that she received. And the goal is to make people feel bad about bad things, aware of it so that ethics kick in.
battlefield 3 or dayz or sega rally or tetris. gun toting killing machines incapable of thought exist in 2 of them. a lunatic driver with no regard for damaging nature exists in one of them. and some a******* obsessed with abstract depictions of phalluses exists in the last.
You've been trolling this entire time, haven't you?
and secondly who said the 2 had to exist in tandem. damsels in distress don't exist in battlefield 3 or dayz or sega rally or tetris. gun toting killing machines incapable of thought exist in 2 of them. a lunatic driver with no regard for damaging nature exists in one of them. and some a******* obsessed with abstract depictions of phalluses exists in the last.
I think you would need to confine any political analysis to games which have a story. The damsel can only really occur in a scenario involving characters.
war, zombie and driving simulators and puzzles, lack critical elements to allow for politicization.
I think what she is driving at is the lack of intentionality. It's a game, of course Miyamoto, hasn't set out to marginalise women, he just has.
The issue at point is people refusing to acknowledged it.
That thunderf00t chap with his rebuttal on double dragon is hysterically lame. The chick can punch the dude in half but has totally failed to for the entire game and only does so in the context of unplayability, which clearly is the antithesis a gaming hero, the whole point is you control hero.
I don't really understand why the need to get so frothy.
Games for the most part are a culture of hyper masculinity, there is nothing super wrong with that so long as it is recognized as such.
To revisit Thunderf00t, saying a man goes after thugs when his woman gets kidnapped or goes home? Get real dude, that is the exact hyper masculinity we are talking about at work. No man would go take on the mob if his woman had been kidnapped, he'd call the police if he had a shred of sense.
If we aren't talking about a regular man, odds on you aren't talking about a regular woman either.
how the s*** are tetris pieces, c****? seriously? That's like saying a f*****g tree looks like an upside down c*** with the leaves for pubes, only sick minded pervs would even think of it.
people aren't refusing to acknowledge it. people are saying 'who cares' and 'this isn't a problem'.
miyamoto wants you to rescue a princess. probably loosely based off rapunzel. a familiar fairytale that everyone knows, its not exactly a mind boggling plot, its familiar and easy to sell. simple and it works again and again. its not a illuminati plot to objectify women. it sells, makes money, simple.
in the same sense mario is a dumbass who only knows how to help people by squashing them and setting them on fire.
where is the mungbean powered men out there defending the rights of men being portrayed as such.
re-imagine the super mario bros plot.
mario is captured by the evil diesel powered lesbian named anita
princess toadstool uses logic and reasoning as well as a intellect to bravely fend of violence and any negative trait of masculinity. everyone agrees with her, because she's a woman, everyone sits around talking about their feelings and how much of an a******* so and so's boyfriend is. anita sees error of her ways, puts a bra back on, apologises to princess toadstool and they are best friends ever since.
I actually wrote quite a bit in response, too much so I deleted it and tried to be more concise so forgive my bluntness. Even then I will probably still f*****g waffle.
So why are the men able to defeat them? Why are the woman essentially never rescuing the men? Why do the woman simply cry for help as she pointed out? Why are the male protagonists always able to break themselves out of prison whenever they're captured in the same stories?
All of this is nonsense. The men in those stories defeat the bad guy because it is a story and any story requires the hero to overcome insurmountable tasks, male or female. Again, thinking that the Damsel is weak trivializes the task of defeating the villain. Not being able to defend yourself against someone portrayed as uncommonly strong is not a sign of weakness.
Just because she didn't give examples of women rescuing men must mean that they don't exist ever right? Lara Croft is a figment of our imagination, just like Buffy, Wonderwoman or Zena.
She gave one example of a woman simply crying out for help which was Princess Peach when she was grabbed by a giant f*****g koopa. I can tell you now I would be screaming for help in the same f*****g situation and if Mario saved me I would use tongue whether he wanted it or not.
And finally male protagonists don't always break themselves out of prison, most of the examples I can think of required outside help. Does that mean that the NPC that helped them was objectifying the weak and helpless protagonist and saw them as little more then a chunk of code to be acted upon? I guess it does but somehow I don't think that's the point.
All of this is largely irrelevant though since it focuses on the fictional construct and not the social impact which is the only thing of worth in this conversation. Whether the trope is overused or not is also irrelevant. Like I said before I don't believe that this fictional trope or any other has any true impact upon society or peoples views and I don't believe she has provided any evidence at all to even marginally support her claim.
In order to be psychologically affected surely I would have to view gaming characters as real representations of people, what kind of trauma would I be going through every time the protagonist dies? What does it mean when I give up and leave the pink princess blob on my screen to their fate with the green and brown villain blob?
There is no conclusive evidence to support the idea that violence in video games leads to violence in reality. There is no evidence at all that shows that the Damsel in Distress trope reinforces the image of women being weak in reality nor that they are objects to be won and owned.
Just because she didn't give examples of women rescuing men must mean that they don't exist ever right? Lara Croft is a figment of our imagination, just like Buffy, Wonderwoman or Zena.
Oh cmon, for so long Lara Croft was just a sex doll for gamers to sn***** about, the way she gets touted as this feminist icon is sad. If that's the best gaming can do then we've got a long way to go.
Where did I say that she was a feminist icon, or even that one was required? Where did I make the point that she was the only example of a female protagonist in games?
Is Drake from Uncharted not an attractive character? Does he not wear tight shirts and pants that accentuate his physique? Does women finding him attractive make him any less of a worthy protagonist? Why is the same treatment not received for Lara? IMO the view that women who are attractive should only be judged upon that one element is passive aggressive misogyny.
Oh it's ok sweetie, no one expects anything of you because you're pretty and if you ever do achieve anything it will be because you are pretty and not because you are athletic and intelligent.
Your point is only remotely valid if you believe that women are not a factor in the market and one of the points the OP was making is that women are a factor in the market and want better representation. It will be difficult to obtain while men like yourself continue to paint any strong attractive female protagonist as anything other than a sex doll.
All of this is nonsense. The men in those stories defeat the bad guy because it is a story and any story requires the hero to overcome insurmountable tasks, male or female. Again, thinking that the Damsel is weak trivializes the task of defeating the villain. Not being able to defend yourself against someone portrayed as uncommonly strong is not a sign of weakness.
And yet it only happens to the women, again and again. Find five games which are honestly similar, where a male is captured squealing for help, and is rescued in a porno outfit.
She gave one example of a woman simply crying out for help which was Princess Peach
You obviously didn't watch the video. There was a montage.
All of this is largely irrelevant though since it focuses on the fictional construct and not the social impact
That's what I've said several times, but that isn't what other people were talking about for my responses to them - they were outright denying that the situation exists.
Oddly you also deny that it exists, then immediately state that it exists but clarify that it isn't a proven problem.
IMO the view that women who are attractive should only be judged upon that one element is passive aggressive misogyny.
This has already been covered. There is a difference between idealised bodies, and the way that one gender is repeatedly treated in the ridiculous armour department, the agency that members of their gender have (a person acts, an object is acted upon), etc.
people aren't refusing to acknowledge it. people are saying 'who cares' and 'this isn't a problem'.
This sentence is the precise problem.
its not a illuminati plot to objectify women.
Exactly, and further illustrates the problem. Thinking of women in this way comes so naturally that it isn't even thought of as an issue. Its absolutely isn't secret world wide male plot to f*** over women, we just do.
What I was driving at with the Thunderf00t example is simply that, his argumentative strategy highlights the deceptively realistic portrayal of the male/female relationship.
He actually said at one point, that most females would consider not going all double dragon in that situation would consider it a relationship ending snub. That is some serious head up ass.
Look at deadlyf, If I was being held prisoner by a giant koopa troopa I would scream for help as well. You can't deny the realism and then start arguing about how you would act in the exact same situation. That is retarded.
Oddly you also deny that it exists, then immediately state that it exists but clarify that it isn't a proven problem.
No, I'm denying that the purpose of the trope is to show women as weak, not that the trope doesn't exist or that at times the Damsel may appear to be weak or even that women may be portrayed negatively in some games. I honestly believe the purpose of the trope in most cases is to show the strength of the villain not the weakness of the damsel. So basically I'm saying her analysis of the trope is wrong (which is just a matter of opinion) and that even if it wasn't there is no evidence to support the theory that it is damaging to society.
And yet it only happens to the women, again and again. Find five games which are honestly similar, where a male is captured squealing for help, and is rescued in a porno outfit.
Off the top of my head I can immediately name Saints Row 3 and it is a far more accurate representation of a man in a porno outfit than I think you could find in any game where a woman is rescued. Unless there are a lot of games out there where women are wearing gimp suits.
I don't deny at all that women may be portrayed in a poor light in games, I just don't think you can make the claim that it has a negative effect on society. It is certainly the case that there are more games that cater to men than women but participation in games are not mandatory and there are still plenty of great either gender neutral games like Mass Effect or Skyrim or even gender positive games like The Longest Journey or that DoA volley ball game which only has female characters so I think I can safely assume was made for women.
And yet it only happens to the women, again and again. Find five games which are honestly similar, where a male is captured squealing for help, and is rescued in a porno outfit.
Not a game but in the movie Hudson Hawk, Andie McDowell (a woman btw) came running out of the castle and Willis remarked about how he was meant to save her, she said she got bored waiting so saved herself. I thought it was amusing.
Why is no one talking about how many men die in video games?
Women getting rescued? Terrible! Men getting killed? Wonderful!
I think I'll go kill a lot of men right now ... or maybe I won't, because they're just video games and anyone who takes them that seriously is mentally ill.
Why is no one talking about how many men die in video games?
Because it presumably doesn't teach anything?
The complaint was about frequent reinforcement of the idea that female characters are weak and inferior, not a specific event happening to them.
Ironically, if you truly want to see enemies less exclusively made up only of men, then you should be challenging the sexist meme that women are weak and incapable of violence or self-determination.
the idea that female characters are weak and inferior, not a specific event happening to them.
Actually, she spent however long I watched (about half before I just couldn't stand any more) talking about how women get captured. I'd say that's a pretty specific event, wouldn't you?
I'm unsure if you guys are genuinely this daft, are just being difficult because you don't like admitting reality, or are just trolling me.
She showed those for the sake of highlighting that:
* The females were always weak and pathetic, only crying for help, whereas male characters were always able to handle the same kidnapper (and not with some slight increase in muscular strength, with their whacky abilities). * Males essentially never have this happen to them, females reccuringly do. * They are repeatedly shown as objects, being only acted upon by men, rather than acting themselves. * Females frequently and uniquely show up dressed as a sexual object, whereas the males don't, a 'sex prize' if they're rescued.
I'm unsure if you guys are genuinely this daft, are just being difficult because you don't like admitting reality, or are just trolling me.She showed those for the sake of highlighting that:* The females were always weak and pathetic, only crying for help, whereas male characters were always able to handle the same kidnapper (and not with some slight increase in muscular strength, with their whacky abilities).* Males essentially never have this happen to them, females reccuringly do.* They are repeatedly shown as objects, being only acted upon by men, rather than acting themselves.* Females frequently and uniquely show up dressed as a sexual object, whereas the males don't, a 'sex prize' if they're rescued.
Played any of the crysis games? Guys in nanosuits that turn you into superman got kidnapped by aliens. I've never seen princess peach dressed in anything other than her pink dress. I'm sure if aliens can capture military personel whatever the hell a "koopa" is can easily pick off a girl in a pink dress.
I'm not getting off the peach bandwagon because for the entirety of the video that i managed to sit through she talked about nothing else. She may have talked about other stuff but I didn't manage to be able to force myself to watch it so I'm not going to comment on something when I didn't see it.
It presumably teaches that male lives are worthless.
Guys sign up to the armed forces of their own free will knowing one day they may die fighting to protect their loved ones and / or country. Dying to save others is hardly worthless.
and from their point of view, they were defending whatever they believed in. if they didn't want to fight her they could have just buggered off to another part of the island
The problem is her psuedo-science, she's picked a couple of poor examples and created a poorly correlated argument, conveniently ignoring everything else to do with it, including the actual causation! She's also misrepresented her findings, made false statements, and not presented any properly researched or critiqued evidence to support her points. All within a microcosm of a wider entertainment medium, capitalist industry and the history of gender inequality.
I take umbrage with that kind of material, especially when it's being touted as actual researched and evidenced information that should be taught in schools! It's like being cool with the Japanese nationalists that present alternative versions of Japan's WW2 history and advocate that the actual historical events were false, or the creationists in the US re-writing their school's textbooks to favor creationism over evolution.
None of that is not to say that of course a bunch of video games have sexist overtones, obviously they do, we all know that. It's because it's fiction targeted at a particular market, in the same way as music, film, books and every other entertainment medium does that, and not just sexist to women, but men as well. No-one condones it (for the most part) or does it intentionally to marginalise women, it's the state of the market and it's progressively changing for the better.
She presents such a compendium of half-truths and falsities about a niche industry with a particular narrative that she's biased to, it's entirely nonsensical and completely misses the point of actual gender equality.
I say for shame on her for not being better at advocating the cause of gender equality, and for not actually advocating it in a even remotely productive or beneficial way. Incompetence doesn't cut it, this might be why she's not producing published and peer-reviewed material, as is the norm.
Posted 01:18am 09/3/13
edit: Watched a bit further. The recurring peach example is a bit flawed, as Nintendo just basically repeats the same game for decades in all of their franchises (same with every pokemon game, same formula of 3 starters from a professor, 8 badges, elite 4, rival, champion), same with pikachu getting kidnapped every episode due to lack of imagination by the writers (and pikachu is a he, and a hero). Peach is barely even on screen, and is just part of their crazy non-evolving essentially random crazy s*** world (whereas you can play as her as a hero in the other games). I haven't played metroid, but don't get the impression that the female character, when a lead, is shown as weak.
Posted 05:38pm 08/3/13
But to be serious for a moment there was an enlightening story on Good Game the other day about racism in video games. Most of the points had never crossed my mind before (just like the racism in Loony Tunes cartoons as I was growing up), but one of the people interviewed was a games developer who had this most poignant point: "We create games that we want to play ourselves. The industry is mainly white males and the content reflects this."
Now before condemning the industry for its apparent selectivity in its employment you have to look at the number of non-white males or females of any race who have career goals to become games developers. "Racism" and "sexism" as a matter of exclusion isn't intentional, it is merely the result of who wants to make these games,
Instead of b****ing about something in a You Tube video make the effort to get involved in the creative process. Feminists and racial-rights supporters spend too much time complaining and not doing. Also disabling comments in your You Tube video makes you look intentionally ignorant.
Posted 05:48pm 08/3/13
Posted 06:12pm 08/3/13
+1
Ratings disabled + comments disabled means the user knows they have no legs to stand on and would get torn apart by criticism.
Posted 06:21pm 08/3/13
Posted 06:32pm 08/3/13
I don't agree with some of what I saw in the video (peach as mentioned above), but know that comments basically have to be disabled if somebody wants to be able to retain their faith in humanity after posting anything on this topic.
Posted 07:51pm 08/3/13
Posted 10:10pm 08/3/13
Posted 10:39pm 08/3/13
Posted 11:09pm 08/3/13
Posted 11:19pm 08/3/13
Posted 11:29pm 08/3/13
I'd be interested to see her creds/beliefs and previous work, to ensure she's not another Hanna Rosin, aka 'The End of Men'. Those kind of feminists actually detriment women I think.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-End-Men-Rise-Women/dp/0670922641
Posted 11:32pm 08/3/13
Good philosophy involves not just stating your point of view and cherry-picking examples to support it. You also need to present potential criticisms of your theory and do your best to refute them. This on the other hand was an amazingly bland and boring monologue, with virtually zero actual analytical value. Surprisingly light on the research as well, considering she asked for and received thousands of dollars to produce it.
Plenty of people are writing and speaking about sexism in our society. A lot of what they have to say is cogent, salient and informative. This isn't one of those people.
Posted 11:50pm 08/3/13
Posted 11:56pm 08/3/13
These sort of arguments are almost always unreasonable. She might not like the story archetype of Damsel in Distress but it works and has been working for thousands of years. You can't tell a story without casting something in a negative light from someones perspective, if you did it would be the worlds most boring story.
I think she is taking the wrong tact. Instead of complaining that men like to play fantasy characters where they get to be the hero and save the girl she should be complaining that there aren't enough games where the girl gets to be the hero and saves the guy.
Posted 11:58pm 08/3/13
Why does this person even exist?
/thread
P.S. Video has such a strong tone of smug it might meet with George Clooney's and create a perfect storm of self satisfaction.
Posted 12:11am 09/3/13
What do earings have to do with feminism?
Posted 12:28am 09/3/13
Posted 01:13am 09/3/13
Personally, I prefer the "sex up both genders" solution, rather than losing out on the wonderful sexually-objectified characters.
Posted 08:39pm 09/3/13
Her complaint was about females being stereotyped as helpless or possessions, what have earrings got to do with that?
Posted 01:41am 09/3/13
This is super cereal guys, let's do something about it so that we can tell future generations that we really made a difference.
Posted 01:45am 09/3/13
Armor in fantasy RPG's is probably the only real gripe I think feminists can truly have in terms of games. Complaining about things like the women in DoA is silly because they are not targeted towards women in even the slightest, they are there to fulfill the fantasies of horny teenage boys.
The reason fantasy armor is an issue is because it isn't the reason people play those games and it can exclude people from being able to create the character they want. Let me be clear, I think it's ok to have skimpy armour, games are a fantasy not a reality and not all women want there character to wear modest clothing, but when a game only has one extreme it is a problem.
Posted 01:58am 09/3/13
All the straw men will have a joyous time doing more than the analytical criticism seen here, I'm sure.
I don't disagree (SWTOR comes to mind), however the highlighted issue there was the 'protective' armour, not the form of the bodies, which are both idealized (I have no problem with idealization).
The criticism was (well, one of the two) that females are reduced to objects more than people, in a great deal of or majority of gaming media. I think that we are agreeing that this is correct? Because her reasoning for this being a negative thing (from what I saw of skipping through the video) was that this (theoretically) leads to (or reinforces) the unequal gender views which we've inherited since the old testament days (from the time when the bible described how much you could sell your daughter for, and how she must marry her rapist, and so on). Her criticism wasn't that it doesn't match the likely audience's desires, I think that she even did touch on that.
Personally, I'd like to see supporting data, as I've played plenty of female objectifying and violent games, and yet don't seem to exhibit any tendencies of thinking those ways. I would prefer if one gender wasn't continuously uniquely objectified, as it makes my geeky female friends uncomfortable, which makes me feel uncomfortable when I see it now. Sexually objectify both I say.
Posted 01:56am 09/3/13
Posted 02:44am 09/3/13
Why would feminine stereotypical clothes be objectifying, unless you've started out with an objectifying attitude about femininity in the first place?
Posted 02:53am 09/3/13
I'd say the armour/clothing argument for fantasy games could be valid, but these are games targeted at a particular audience, men. It's no different to other things or mediums targeted at a female audience that have overly ripped men and/or in skimpy clothes. I'd cite the Magic Mike movie for example here.
It happens on both sides, so it does seem a bit hypocritical.
Posted 02:49am 09/3/13
Posted 03:08am 09/3/13
I've known a lot of ass-girls, but the more important point is that Scarlett isn't even doing anything except turning to show butt and sideboob, whereas everybody else is.
Google images search The Hawkeye Initiative (though I think that the Mary Jane one is a stretch) and you will never be able to unsee it in pop culture imagery again.
Again, I don't mind sexualisation, I love it, but her point was that its persistent uniqueness to one gender (in regular storytelling and not porn) possibly reinforces, on a mass scale, the objectifying views of women in society. That it makes my female friends uncomfortable (who otherwise love these things), is what makes it uncomfortable for me, I'd rather that the industry move to not constantly reducing one gender to tits and ass. Do it for both genders, or save it for porn.
Posted 03:09am 09/3/13
- Alice: Madness Returns
- Tomb Raider
- StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty (refresher replay)
- World of WarCraft (main is a female undead warlock)
First two have strong female protagonists, the third has a strong female antagonist (I'll excuse the ending, since the "helplessness" is short-lived with the sequel). The only wouldbe 'negative' would be that the first three characters are sexualised to some degree (appearance/art). But that's a pretty long bow to draw.
I guess my point is..uh...yeah - females in games, don't need guys to bail them out.
Posted 03:29am 09/3/13
Posted 04:18am 09/3/13
So big earrings remind you of femininity via stereotypes, and you're... saying that you can't take her seriously while she's still reminding you of femininity, because she should expect to be objectified while she reminds you of the very idea of female?
I think that you've proved their larger point without even realising it. Sad lawl. :/
"Pft, society doesn't objectify females" "BTW don't be female-like if you don't want to be objectified".
Yeah, agreed. She had some good points, but games have a lot of strong cases scattered about, and some of the ones she mentioned weren't very good.
Posted 05:59am 09/3/13
And chances are she won't bother reading any comments anywhere, or watching the videos that tear her arguments to bits because {insert whatever insecurity here}. There's plenty of girls on youtube who speak their mind and don't get death threats, if you have to resort to just disabling comments then maybe you should take a look at what you're putting up. Is it blatantly offensive? Are you just plain wrong? Sort of reminds me of a child who puts their fingers in their ears and screams la la la la la when you tell them they're doing something wrong.
But don't you see? Tomb raider is just one game man, there's hundreds of thousands of sexist games out there. Oh the humanity.
Have to maybe kind of sort of agree with this (whoever "steph" is). Body piercings of all kinds of weird nature go on all over the world in women and men. Who gives a s*** what kind of earrings she wears (unless they're made of actual human body parts, then we should worry). On a more "constructive criticism" note, anything that moves or dangles or jingles can be a distraction in a video and if wanting to be taken seriously should be kept to a minimum for simplicity sake if you ask me (which no one ever does).
But why ARE there no more female models in general games? There was in some previous games (like quake 2, unreal tournament, etc).
Speaking of women, what does everyone see as my avatar? A girl with glasses? I tried to change it but no matter what I upload, it always ends up being the girl with glasses (on my computer anyway). Either avatar uploads are broke, or zomg sexist forumzzz
Posted 09:31am 09/3/13
Posted 09:45am 09/3/13
that video was f*****g boring, but reading the titles of the episodes i'd be interested in a more palatable presentation of the ideas because
female characters in video games are f*****g boring male nerd fantasies with zero personality. i'm sure there's five good examples that counter this sentiment but it is far and away in the majority. anything that fixes this is a good thing.
parabol, your comment on her hoop earrings is genuinely f*****g crazy. i'm not nerf lord, i won't type long comments trying to explain to your retarded psyche why what you said was f*****g crazy, but believe me, i'm right.
Posted 09:46am 09/3/13
if there is now a market for games tailored more towards female players then i am sure developers would do whatever to capture those dollars... perhaps some empowered female developers could make this game! ;)
Posted 01:14pm 09/3/13
I would suggest that interactive story telling is still relatively young. Therefore the basic stories we can compelling make interactive are the ones we know the ass out of, such as the damsel in distress.
I don't know I guess she make valid points. Though I would point out to Nerf Lord that the 'lazy writer' doesn't really cut it as an excuse. Mario and Peach have had the same relationship for a quarter of century now. F*** Yahtzee routinely points out that peach is not really useful for anything other than getting kidnapped. It would be totally trivial write a story where she is not an object to be retrieved.
Posted 10:49am 09/3/13
Besides, in most cases of women being objectified it's not about the woman but other things that a woman can be used to represent. It's usually women representing a fantasy for male sexual desire which makes women uncomfortable and personally I think that's the fault of a prudish western civilization making people believe that sex is somehow wrong. How else are they meant to represent that in a work of fiction? A picture of a lubed up hand?
Saying that men are bad because they like to fantasize about being a hero and saving the girl is ridiculous, saying that an entertainment industry shouldn't facilitate that fantasy is equally ridiculous. Feminism is, or should be, about equal opportunity not this whinging about women being objectified in completely voluntary games. Take Mario for example, no s*** Peach gets kidnapped in every game, who the f*** plays Mario expecting something different? It's not like they lied to you about it and tricked you into playing. Don't like it, don't play them, if enough people feel the same way then they will change the way they make games to suit the markets desires.
Posted 01:08pm 09/3/13
It's all stupendously ridiculous when considered in context to what fiction is and what actual gender equality is. As I said earlier, these kinds of things don't help womens rights.
Posted 01:29pm 09/3/13
Lets ignore the Mario Kart Series, Mario Golf Series, Super Smash Bros Melee and Brawl, Super Paper Mario, etc, etc...
Posted 01:54pm 09/3/13
deadlyf wins the thread, no more needs to be said.
Posted 01:56pm 09/3/13
She says core franchise, and mentions these others (and then stupidly suggests that peach should have her own game in the core franchise - not understanding that mario saving peach is one of the checkboxes to determine whether it is a core game).
Posted 03:25pm 09/3/13
Posted 04:41pm 10/3/13
http://imgur.com/DcAFPUE
Posted 05:16pm 10/3/13
Posted 05:20pm 10/3/13
Posted 06:04pm 10/3/13
Think u mean v backs dude.
Posted 07:02pm 10/3/13
Lara Croft's reboot has got to be one of the most empowering, kickass female protagonists in recent memory. Especially when you consider how far the reboot has taken the character away from her "tits and arse" roots.
Posted 07:34pm 10/3/13
Posted 07:49pm 10/3/13
you should watch this. It explains exactly why this point of view is retarded. I'm not saying there isn't glaring flaws in her argument but this isn't one of them.
Posted 08:06pm 10/3/13
Activist: Sexism in video games
Me: I know right, it happens to guys too.
Activist: This isnt about MEN RAAAAR!
I'm well aware of the other side
Activist: Sexism in video games
Lunatic: F*** YOU B****!
Why we all can't work together on this baffles me, we're way to quick to let the loonies direct the course of the debate.
Posted 08:09pm 10/3/13
Again, both genders are idealized, but the women are frequently reduced to nothing but sex pose toys, whereas the guys aren't.
I don't know whether I'd agree that it necessarily encourages harmful thinking, but the described situation is very true.
Posted 08:19pm 10/3/13
Outstanding!
Posted 08:46pm 10/3/13
This is all going to sound pretty glib, but to me it seems like the the root cause of the problem. Shooters are mostly played by guys. Subsequently the characters are male, and in order to fit their role they are generally made to be the most powerful character in the game. Its the stereotypical male fantasy, and they give it to the players because thats what they want, at least as far as sales data indicates.
Now what does every virile male need to complete their power fantasy? A hot piece of arm candy, right? Hence the neverending parade of complacent female characters.
Effectively solving this problem seems to me mostly a matter of changing the perception of what a normal male character in a game should be. The sexism targeting females is part of the exact same sexism that compartmentalises the gender roles. Drop the unrealistic grunts and the half naked companions should fall by the wayside soon after. Whether or not this is possible, I can't say. I am certainly offended by characters like Marcus Fenix. I grew up loving characters like Roger Wilco and Guybrush Threepwood, not the musclebound douchebag action heroes that seem to permeate today's market.
I'm not even convinced that its a problem that needs solving. The market is generally a pretty good indicator of people's desires, and if there was a large market for smart female characters, there would likely be games out there to cash in on that. Maybe it's just a function of guys that they're inevitably going to go for lowest common denominator s*** at some point. Other media is full of such examples - romance and action are both genres that have a very big gender split, and the characters function in certain ways as a result. Is there anything wrong with that? Perhaps if women played more shooters and less Farmville we might see some different characters in our games. Perhaps people just kinda suck.
Posted 11:04pm 10/3/13
wheres the man-inest outcry when hard core porn stories are on front and centre display in every k mart, book store, talked about on morning shows about some sloot, slooting it up all over the place.
yeah, there was none. but thats alright for the 'repressed' gender.
true fact, these 2 diesel powered lesbians were arguing about women being objectified in video games, classed as the sexualised fantasies of evil males and they ain't too happy about it. they sourced some free cash from kickstarter from a bunch of like minded lemmings and neutered males to go and tell the world all about it. GIRL POWAH
Posted 11:11pm 10/3/13
Posted 12:09am 11/3/13
Posted 12:18am 11/3/13
Posted 12:34am 11/3/13
girls play farmville
boys play battlefield 3
http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/safran/stories/s3701688.htm
sympathetic to your views nerf you diesel powered lesbian sympathiser.
Posted 12:43am 11/3/13
No, I vaguely recall hearing something about some hugely successful crowdfunding for a series on female gaming tropes.
k.
Posted 12:44am 11/3/13
Posted 12:56am 11/3/13
Posted 01:37am 11/3/13
I do sort of find it a waste of crowd funding to go out and get a kickstarter to dress like a lumberjack (is her dressing like a man deliberate?) and sit in front of a camera for an hour putting picture-in-picture views of games beside you.
I mean seriously, how much does a video camera cost? You can pick them up for a couple of hundred bucks (because as if you need 1080p for youtube), a laptop for about a grand (lets say a half decent-ish one) and some video editing software (don't know how much that s*** costs). There's no way all of that equals $100k+ or whatever they got. You don't need an entire film crew to do this kind of thing.
Posted 02:03am 11/3/13
That's not even remotely true? It's an obvious product of our caveman/evolutionary origins.
Posted 02:20am 11/3/13
Given his earlier rant about lesbians destroying family values, mockery of women's choices in sex, etc, it's a rabbit hole which no sane human will return from after going down...
Posted 02:14am 11/3/13
What does she take issue with, the trope or the fact that video games are using the trope? Both? Why isn't she taking it up with other forms of entertainment media, or the writing source of tropes?
It's all a bit misinformed and misdirected really, and tbh those hoop earrings are massive, shes probably wearing them especially for negative comment.
Posted 02:23am 11/3/13
I think that she was talking about the examples where the female simply cries "help me" and gets helplessly kidnapped every time, never more than a weak pathetic lamb. (hence the "damsel in distress" title).
You have to be trolling? She wore a non-revealing flannel shirt, obviously fitted for a woman's frame, and that's "dressing like a man" ?
Posted 02:24am 11/3/13
Video games in some respects are still a niche industry comparable to the market, you don't change something like that from a niche.
Those videos clearly don't take 100K to make, we've made better ones at work for client testimonials for under £1K. What a rip off.
Posted 04:12am 11/3/13
Looking through the list of backers, it seems that there were a lot of girls wanting this to get made.
The huge amount is just showing that there's obviously a demand for it. People will put in way more than what a project necessarily needs - check out what the SMBC guy ended up on for a package of his comics, which are already available online for free.
Posted 10:34pm 11/3/13
Posted 01:10am 12/3/13
Does the author reference?
Are the references from a credible source?
Are the conclusions logical and clear?
What are limits of the study?
Any conflict of interest?
Is the author credible or a blogger with no formal education, is claiming expertise on a subject when others are more suited, given a wide audience and a platform to voice their opinion?
I would like to quote Urthboy - Hellsong lyrics because there are better ways to spend 100k than on youtube videos:
Posted 02:16am 12/3/13
It's a discussion about tropes... With video out-takes of the examples which she's talking about...
Posted 02:55am 12/3/13
But the fact remains that she DID receive over 100 grand. If you got THAT much money, you'd want to make sure you did a damn good job of it rather than just sitting in front of a camera for 40 minutes. You'd want to get your lazy fat ass (I know she's not actually fat) out onto the street with a proper damn film crew and actually interview real people and get their opinion on the matter and have an independent editor edit it all together so as not to introduce any bias she might have into the final piece (I don't actually know who edits it).
I don't take issue with the fact that she GOT that much money, I do think she should feel quite bad about the level of quality she's delivering though, for the amount she did get.
I guess we'll have to keep staring at this trainwreck for the duration to see if the other parts are any better. For 100k though, I'd at least turn a room into a temporary studio and get guests in to interview or walk around on the street with a crew interviewing random people to see whether they shared the same opinion.
Posted 03:14am 12/3/13
That's the real root cause, video games are just a symptom, one of many.
You could defo spend 100K on that kind of stuff and then it'd pass greazy's very valid question list, it'd also be taken a lot more seriously too.
Posted 03:21am 12/3/13
I didn't agree with half the video, but I'm pretty skeptical of those with the relentless constantly-readjusting criticism tbh.
Posted 09:42am 12/3/13
you do realise that normal people readjust arguments when presented with new facts or points of view that make sense to them right? and that that's a good thing?
Posted 10:03am 12/3/13
Posted 10:19am 12/3/13
Someone should promise a shoddy thrown together video series about male tropes in games, throw it up on kickstarter and then see how much they can pocket from the 150K difference.
Posted 10:29am 12/3/13
Posted 12:17pm 12/3/13
Posted 10:17pm 12/3/13
you talkin' to me?
are YOU talking; to ME?
Posted 03:26pm 15/3/13
Posted 03:43pm 15/3/13
Posted 11:53pm 15/3/13
Posted 12:02am 16/3/13
Posted 12:34am 16/3/13
Posted 12:59am 16/3/13
Should Feminist Frequency be immune to all criticism simply because Sarkeesian is a woman though?
Posted 01:31am 16/3/13
Posted 01:52am 16/3/13
she's over analyzing 'games' to form an opinion to suit an agenda that leads to her getting a buttload of cash.
games are made for a market, there was no over riding plot/plan/scheme to create these 'tropes' for the sole purpose of subjugating women as objects to create social dominance over them. its a simple formula that sells. its 1 segment - she's a nutjob, and you're a whiteknight defending the honor of a diesel powered lesbian trying to justify her massive kickstarter payday. girl power
Posted 01:55am 16/3/13
Posted 03:07am 16/3/13
k. Going by your first post, you genuinely should seek professional help about your fear of lesbians, contraceptives, etc.
Posted 09:08am 16/3/13
cainer is living, drooling proof that things like this video are necessary. People as far gone as him are probably irredeemable, but people need to be aware that there are individuals out there who are just absolutely warped and steps need to be made to rectify it.
Posted 10:01am 16/3/13
That rationalwiki post about him is some of the most biased posting I've seen on such wikis and really has no place on a site presumably dedicated to rational thinking.
The points Thunderf00t made in his response to that feminist while at times strongly ladled with sarcasm seemed to be somewhat *factually based* which is more than can be said for the woman he was responding to who was deliberately setting out to present the results from an intellectually dishonest study designed to meet a pre-determined outcome.
Posted 11:21am 16/3/13
i would replace 'necessary' with 'understandable'. and then i would agree whole heartedly. i can understand how frustrating it must be for a woman to run into people like cainer and MRA reddit and think 'his insanity is accepted. i guess we should fight fire with fire'.
but there is no place for preaching s*** that is flat out wrong.
Posted 11:25am 16/3/13
I'd be really interested to hear what parts of the video you agreed with.
Just because one thing is apparent, does not mean that another thing is also apparent. Cainer being a d******* doesn't validate the video in the OP.
Posted 11:39am 16/3/13
The trope of unevenly reducing just one gender to weak & helpless or sexual object in games is well evidenced. She produced a number of examples in that video. Find a handful which are honestly comparable where a man is the helpless victim, showing up inexplicably wearing only boardshorts or bdsm gear or something when rescued.
Posted 11:35am 16/3/13
People are judging this video very harshly and accusing it of jumping to conclusions and things like that. I find this kind of ironic because making a judgement on everything this person has to say after she has only presented 1/12th of her material seems to me like people are jumping the gun a bit. The way I saw this video was pretty much as a bare-bones basic 101 of the history of the damsel in distress trope used in video games - that's it. Hopefully she will get in to some more meatier aspects as the series goes on, and I'll reserve my final judgement till I see part twelve.
Posted 12:20pm 16/3/13
She's interpreted it to suit her agenda, interpretations are not evidence or fact, they are opinions. Not only that but she uses a trope with thousands of years of time to have a negative impact on gender equality, and then talks about it from the view of an industry that is relatively new. Despite the relative newness of the games industry, it has come about in a time where women's rights are stronger than ever. She gives no evidence to back up the claim that it is having a negative impact in society.
Lets take the fictional concept and translate it to a situation based in reality.
A woman is over come by smoke in a house fire (because women are weak and can't breath in CO2, weaklings), and a fireman rescues her (male of course, everyone knows that women can never be firemen). Now the woman is sitting outside her house sucking on a canister of oxygen (when the fireman throws her over his shoulder and takes her back to his firecave to keep as his slave forever, the end), when the fireman, thinking she is quite the looker asks her out on a date (where she has absolutely no free choice to refuse), which she kindly declines because she isn't a fictional character with no free will of her own and despite all the fictional tropes in all the world she can make up her own mind (and the fireman was black and she's a racist).
'ists and 'isms have no place in telling fiction what it can and can't do. That's the Thought Police's job.
Posted 12:46pm 16/3/13
You didn't watch the video. The example of crystal was right at the very start, and then a montage of them later. As she said, "Subjects act, objects are acted upon."
So why are the men able to defeat them? Why are the woman essentially never rescuing the men? Why do the woman simply cry for help as she pointed out? Why are the male protagonists always able to break themselves out of prison whenever they're captured in the same stories?
Her point wasn't that it sets out to make women look weak, but that it's a toxic meme which reinforces the notion which exists in our society.
She reported a real situation for reasons that she deems important. Most all of my geeky female friends have expressed how uncomfortable they are made by these stereotypes. Now that I'm not blind to it, I'm made uncomfortable by it. My agenda is "stop making things which perpetuate s***** stereotypes", so sue me.
That's exactly what I said earlier. However you just admitted that it exists, after denying the whole situation. Her actual statement is not a particularly bold claim.
Posted 12:47pm 16/3/13
and then there is the trope that men are single minded violent thugs that only know how to solve problems with violence. incapable of reason, sexual lust machines, all they know how to do is fight and f***.
and nerf, men are stronger its a simple fact. women are protected in society from the dirty, dangerous, undesireable jobs. thats why generally there isn't women firefighters, garbage collectors, carpenters, shall i go on ?
Posted 12:59pm 16/3/13
If you think that this is a problem, then do something about it?
Personally I can't think of many games that really fit that profile, maybe arcade fighers. Mario, Link, Starfox, and so on - the ones out rescuing the incapable females - are not shown this way.
Even if were true though, how on earth would that lead to you calling her a "diesel powered lesbian", going on rants about family values, contraceptives, and so on?
It's already been discussed that physical strength wasn't what was being discussed. You're gunning your (thankfully now less insane) platform on an equivocation fallacy. But, given your earlier rant, perhaps you -really mean- mentally weaker, psychologically weaker, less competent, and are just proving her point.
Posted 01:16pm 16/3/13
firstly, i don't have a problem with it, its a f***en game. its stooping the low politically correct platform of having a sook about everything to push an unpopular agenda by making everyone else feel bad about it.
and secondly who said the 2 had to exist in tandem. damsels in distress don't exist in battlefield 3 or dayz or sega rally or tetris. gun toting killing machines incapable of thought exist in 2 of them. a lunatic driver with no regard for damaging nature exists in one of them. and some a******* obsessed with abstract depictions of phalluses exists in the last.
hey look i just overanaylzed something to suit an agenda. heap money and praise upon me. defend me oh whiteknights of the world for i am so oppressed for my lunatic views that i need to have a sook on TEDx(the nutjob version) about it. woe is me (give me money).
Posted 01:29pm 16/3/13
Huh? Are you denying the diesel powered lesbians, women thinking that they can just have sex when they want, destruction of family values spiel?
So why did you describe it as a negative thing?
It's obviously not unpopular, given the amount of funding that she received. And the goal is to make people feel bad about bad things, aware of it so that ethics kick in.
You've been trolling this entire time, haven't you?
Posted 01:38pm 16/3/13
I think you would need to confine any political analysis to games which have a story. The damsel can only really occur in a scenario involving characters.
war, zombie and driving simulators and puzzles, lack critical elements to allow for politicization.
I think what she is driving at is the lack of intentionality. It's a game, of course Miyamoto, hasn't set out to marginalise women, he just has.
The issue at point is people refusing to acknowledged it.
That thunderf00t chap with his rebuttal on double dragon is hysterically lame. The chick can punch the dude in half but has totally failed to for the entire game and only does so in the context of unplayability, which clearly is the antithesis a gaming hero, the whole point is you control hero.
I don't really understand why the need to get so frothy.
Games for the most part are a culture of hyper masculinity, there is nothing super wrong with that so long as it is recognized as such.
To revisit Thunderf00t, saying a man goes after thugs when his woman gets kidnapped or goes home? Get real dude, that is the exact hyper masculinity we are talking about at work. No man would go take on the mob if his woman had been kidnapped, he'd call the police if he had a shred of sense.
If we aren't talking about a regular man, odds on you aren't talking about a regular woman either.
Posted 01:46pm 16/3/13
Posted 01:51pm 16/3/13
I want to play that game, it sounds awesome. Super Police Complaint Maker Turbo Edition.
Posted 01:54pm 16/3/13
Don't be a d***.
Posted 01:57pm 16/3/13
Posted 02:01pm 16/3/13
miyamoto wants you to rescue a princess. probably loosely based off rapunzel. a familiar fairytale that everyone knows, its not exactly a mind boggling plot, its familiar and easy to sell. simple and it works again and again. its not a illuminati plot to objectify women. it sells, makes money, simple.
in the same sense mario is a dumbass who only knows how to help people by squashing them and setting them on fire.
where is the mungbean powered men out there defending the rights of men being portrayed as such.
re-imagine the super mario bros plot.
mario is captured by the evil diesel powered lesbian named anita
princess toadstool uses logic and reasoning as well as a intellect to bravely fend of violence and any negative trait of masculinity. everyone agrees with her, because she's a woman, everyone sits around talking about their feelings and how much of an a******* so and so's boyfriend is. anita sees error of her ways, puts a bra back on, apologises to princess toadstool and they are best friends ever since.
the end
could be on to a winner here
Posted 02:11pm 16/3/13
All of this is nonsense. The men in those stories defeat the bad guy because it is a story and any story requires the hero to overcome insurmountable tasks, male or female. Again, thinking that the Damsel is weak trivializes the task of defeating the villain. Not being able to defend yourself against someone portrayed as uncommonly strong is not a sign of weakness.
Just because she didn't give examples of women rescuing men must mean that they don't exist ever right? Lara Croft is a figment of our imagination, just like Buffy, Wonderwoman or Zena.
She gave one example of a woman simply crying out for help which was Princess Peach when she was grabbed by a giant f*****g koopa. I can tell you now I would be screaming for help in the same f*****g situation and if Mario saved me I would use tongue whether he wanted it or not.
And finally male protagonists don't always break themselves out of prison, most of the examples I can think of required outside help. Does that mean that the NPC that helped them was objectifying the weak and helpless protagonist and saw them as little more then a chunk of code to be acted upon? I guess it does but somehow I don't think that's the point.
All of this is largely irrelevant though since it focuses on the fictional construct and not the social impact which is the only thing of worth in this conversation. Whether the trope is overused or not is also irrelevant. Like I said before I don't believe that this fictional trope or any other has any true impact upon society or peoples views and I don't believe she has provided any evidence at all to even marginally support her claim.
In order to be psychologically affected surely I would have to view gaming characters as real representations of people, what kind of trauma would I be going through every time the protagonist dies? What does it mean when I give up and leave the pink princess blob on my screen to their fate with the green and brown villain blob?
There is no conclusive evidence to support the idea that violence in video games leads to violence in reality. There is no evidence at all that shows that the Damsel in Distress trope reinforces the image of women being weak in reality nor that they are objects to be won and owned.
Posted 02:40pm 16/3/13
Oh cmon, for so long Lara Croft was just a sex doll for gamers to sn***** about, the way she gets touted as this feminist icon is sad. If that's the best gaming can do then we've got a long way to go.
Posted 04:58pm 16/3/13
Is Drake from Uncharted not an attractive character? Does he not wear tight shirts and pants that accentuate his physique? Does women finding him attractive make him any less of a worthy protagonist? Why is the same treatment not received for Lara? IMO the view that women who are attractive should only be judged upon that one element is passive aggressive misogyny.
Oh it's ok sweetie, no one expects anything of you because you're pretty and if you ever do achieve anything it will be because you are pretty and not because you are athletic and intelligent.
Your point is only remotely valid if you believe that women are not a factor in the market and one of the points the OP was making is that women are a factor in the market and want better representation. It will be difficult to obtain while men like yourself continue to paint any strong attractive female protagonist as anything other than a sex doll.
Posted 05:04pm 16/3/13
And yet it only happens to the women, again and again. Find five games which are honestly similar, where a male is captured squealing for help, and is rescued in a porno outfit.
You obviously didn't watch the video. There was a montage.
That's what I've said several times, but that isn't what other people were talking about for my responses to them - they were outright denying that the situation exists.
Oddly you also deny that it exists, then immediately state that it exists but clarify that it isn't a proven problem.
This has already been covered. There is a difference between idealised bodies, and the way that one gender is repeatedly treated in the ridiculous armour department, the agency that members of their gender have (a person acts, an object is acted upon), etc.
Posted 05:08pm 16/3/13
Posted 05:20pm 16/3/13
This sentence is the precise problem.
Exactly, and further illustrates the problem. Thinking of women in this way comes so naturally that it isn't even thought of as an issue. Its absolutely isn't secret world wide male plot to f*** over women, we just do.
What I was driving at with the Thunderf00t example is simply that, his argumentative strategy highlights the deceptively realistic portrayal of the male/female relationship.
He actually said at one point, that most females would consider not going all double dragon in that situation would consider it a relationship ending snub. That is some serious head up ass.
Look at deadlyf, If I was being held prisoner by a giant koopa troopa I would scream for help as well. You can't deny the realism and then start arguing about how you would act in the exact same situation. That is retarded.
Posted 05:37pm 16/3/13
Off the top of my head I can immediately name Saints Row 3 and it is a far more accurate representation of a man in a porno outfit than I think you could find in any game where a woman is rescued. Unless there are a lot of games out there where women are wearing gimp suits.
I don't deny at all that women may be portrayed in a poor light in games, I just don't think you can make the claim that it has a negative effect on society. It is certainly the case that there are more games that cater to men than women but participation in games are not mandatory and there are still plenty of great either gender neutral games like Mass Effect or Skyrim or even gender positive games like The Longest Journey or that DoA volley ball game which only has female characters so I think I can safely assume was made for women.
Posted 02:12am 17/3/13
Haven't played it, but am fairly sure that's comedy mocking anything and everything about games. :P
Ok, that's all I was arguing.
I agree. Though it makes my friends uncomfortable, and now makes me uncomfortable, just for the continuous stereotyping.
Absolutely. :P
Posted 03:32am 17/3/13
Posted 01:41pm 17/3/13
Women getting rescued? Terrible! Men getting killed? Wonderful!
I think I'll go kill a lot of men right now ... or maybe I won't, because they're just video games and anyone who takes them that seriously is mentally ill.
Posted 02:02pm 17/3/13
Because it presumably doesn't teach anything?
The complaint was about frequent reinforcement of the idea that female characters are weak and inferior, not a specific event happening to them.
Ironically, if you truly want to see enemies less exclusively made up only of men, then you should be challenging the sexist meme that women are weak and incapable of violence or self-determination.
Posted 03:11pm 17/3/13
Posted 03:42pm 17/3/13
She showed those for the sake of highlighting that:
* The females were always weak and pathetic, only crying for help, whereas male characters were always able to handle the same kidnapper (and not with some slight increase in muscular strength, with their whacky abilities).
* Males essentially never have this happen to them, females reccuringly do.
* They are repeatedly shown as objects, being only acted upon by men, rather than acting themselves.
* Females frequently and uniquely show up dressed as a sexual object, whereas the males don't, a 'sex prize' if they're rescued.
Posted 03:53pm 17/3/13
Posted 04:02pm 17/3/13
Played any of the crysis games? Guys in nanosuits that turn you into superman got kidnapped by aliens. I've never seen princess peach dressed in anything other than her pink dress. I'm sure if aliens can capture military personel whatever the hell a "koopa" is can easily pick off a girl in a pink dress.
I'm not getting off the peach bandwagon because for the entirety of the video that i managed to sit through she talked about nothing else. She may have talked about other stuff but I didn't manage to be able to force myself to watch it so I'm not going to comment on something when I didn't see it.
Posted 04:59pm 17/3/13
It presumably teaches that male lives are worthless.
Posted 05:19pm 17/3/13
Posted 05:24pm 17/3/13
Guys sign up to the armed forces of their own free will knowing one day they may die fighting to protect their loved ones and / or country. Dying to save others is hardly worthless.
Posted 07:29pm 17/3/13
Posted 09:07pm 17/3/13
Posted 10:00pm 17/3/13
Posted 05:08am 18/3/13
I take umbrage with that kind of material, especially when it's being touted as actual researched and evidenced information that should be taught in schools! It's like being cool with the Japanese nationalists that present alternative versions of Japan's WW2 history and advocate that the actual historical events were false, or the creationists in the US re-writing their school's textbooks to favor creationism over evolution.
None of that is not to say that of course a bunch of video games have sexist overtones, obviously they do, we all know that. It's because it's fiction targeted at a particular market, in the same way as music, film, books and every other entertainment medium does that, and not just sexist to women, but men as well. No-one condones it (for the most part) or does it intentionally to marginalise women, it's the state of the market and it's progressively changing for the better.
She presents such a compendium of half-truths and falsities about a niche industry with a particular narrative that she's biased to, it's entirely nonsensical and completely misses the point of actual gender equality.
I say for shame on her for not being better at advocating the cause of gender equality, and for not actually advocating it in a even remotely productive or beneficial way. Incompetence doesn't cut it, this might be why she's not producing published and peer-reviewed material, as is the norm.
#endrant