It's fine-tuned for excellent mouse and keyboard play; it's got dozens of visual and interface options to tweak; and, of course, it's got 4K resolution and AMD Mantle support for the hardcore rig-building crowd.

And the system requirements are on par with where they should be for that type of game as well.

Let me guess... You're one of those hardware buffs right?

back when you used to come into my TS and be like that puppy dog that follows Spike around in the cartoons, waiting to talk about graphics all the time).

The funny thing was that resolution scaling was useless to me as I was running 5760x1080. I'd need 4 Titans to run Bf4 on ultra with scaling. The equivalent of 6 GTX480s.

2: You say I have a single 1080 monitor, when in fact I have 3 (you know this) and have them for the real estate as I do things in multiple games.

3: You say I'm not a hardware buff when in fact you know first hand through conversation that I am and my experience is way beyond yours. (Not that comparing experience would normally matter at all, but in the context of what you're inferring, it now does)

4: You say my average fps is much lower than what I've shown but you have no evidence of that. Most likely because your personal experience involves running too many Ultras where you get a hit in performance for no visual benefit. Us hardware buffs don't stand for this nonsense.

The enthusiasts out there with their heads screwed on know BF4 is about resolution, texture quality, and frame rate. Mesh High to Ultra does nothing visually, but takes another 10% out of your system. I suppose you're one of those hardware buffs.

This is why I'm actually an enthusiast, and you're just a "Guys look at my rig, it's fast simply because I spent lots of money and it runs all Ultra" kind of dude.