We
reported this week about a controversial response by
Blizzard towards the winner of a recent
Hearthstone esports event, suspending
Ng Wai ‘blitzchung’ Chung and stripping him of his prize money after he shouted support for the protests and protesters currently engaged in action in
Hong Kong. Backlash for the move went, for lack of a better term "viral", and today Blizzard's president
J. Allen Brack has responded to the publisher-developer's actions.
From a statement you can
read in full here, Brack exclaimed that "blitzchung used his segment to make a statement about the situation in Hong Kong—in violation of rules he acknowledged and understood, and this is why we took action", however, goes on to suggest that [Blizzard] "reacted too quickly". He also reiterates emphatically in the post that their actions had nothing to do with any stakes Blizzard has in
China (and by extension with
Tencent Holdings Limited). Brack also confirmed that they've decided to award blitzchung his rightful winnings because "in the tournament itself blitzchung *played* fair". They've also reduced his tournament participation ban from 12 months, down to six months. The casters who were also reprimanded have equally had their bans reduced down to six months.
So what does all of this mean?
It sets a dangerous precedent to the fledgling world of esports, but also reflects poorly on a progressive platform in gaming in general. The
NFL players who've been lambasted for taking a knee in silent protest during the
American national anthem, in concert with -- and in support of --
Colin Kaepernick, who did so because of racial inequality are constantly berated for their actions. "Politics has no place in sports", is the usual line these things tend to filter out of the divide, but if we consider sports as an expression of skill, character and will, then surely there
is a place for personal viewpoints and character stance in an ever-connected world.
If we move to punish people for having an opinion that is wholly against oppression and want to strive towards equality, then what are we actually punishing?
Posted 09:14pm 12/10/19
Not trying to be a d*** but just sayin
Posted 10:22pm 12/10/19
My basic point is that humans who plays sports are still human. And if their stance is in the progression and progressive nature of humans, against any level of oppression, they should be allowed to be heard.
We also touched on the NBA in our previous post.
Not sure why you’re picking holes in this, to be honest.
last edited by Steve Farrelly at 22:22:24 12/Oct/19
Posted 09:26am 13/10/19
Posted 09:41am 14/10/19
Posted 11:12pm 14/10/19
he can do it on his own platform.
Posted 03:47pm 15/10/19
Posted 10:59pm 15/10/19
Posted 08:01am 17/10/19
Employer of the stain on the NFL memory holes Houston Rockets merch in China.
Posted 08:18pm 17/10/19
Posted 09:14pm 17/10/19
You don't get to pick your battles after that. when faced with an actual cost to running their colours up the mast against an actual police state Blizzard chose craven capitulation. f*** them.