At a preview event for Battlefield 1's first expansion, They Shall Not Pass, EA showed off sneak peek details regarding the rest of their DLC content as well. Key among those details for a site called AusGamers — news of a Gallipoli Beach Landing coming to the third expansion, titled "Turning Tides".
This heavily implies — though does not confirm — the idea that ANZACs will feature as an army force by the time the third expansion rolls around. Previously members of DICE have been extremely coy when questioned about the addition of Aussie and New Zealand armed forces in multiplayer. The French army has been added to They Shall Not Pass — the first expansion pack — and the expansion itself revolves around French engagements. Turning Tides focuses on Naval battles, so there is a possibility the ANZACs don't get a good look in — but there'd be a whole mess of upset Aussies (and characteristically easy going Kiwis) if the Gallipoli Campaign didn't feature diggers.
The second expansion "In the Name of the Tsar" will focus on the Eastern European Light Cavalry known as the Hussars, and promises expanded horseplay, and the fourth expansion "Apocalypse" wasn't detailed much, but will almost definitely have nothing to do with a blue dude mumbling his way through the second worst X-Men movie.
Other news out of the preview event includes the fact that prominent Battlefield playing Youtubers prefer to go for kills instead of playing the fucking objective, as evidenced by the following screenshot. Meanwhile, you can read my thoughts about
the new Frontlines mode now!
Posted 07:08pm 13/3/17
Posted 07:11pm 13/3/17
A: they have the British Army already
B: the French army joins the game with this expansion pack (should have been there from the get-go)
C: it's a pretty important cultural event in the history of a relatively young nation
D: I said it was possible that the Anzacs wouldn't be added
E: I want it to happen
Posted 07:56am 14/3/17
Posted 10:53am 14/3/17
Posted 11:42am 14/3/17
Posted 07:04pm 14/3/17
Two relatively young nations, mate.
Posted 10:25am 15/3/17
Right you are Ken
Posted 12:45pm 15/3/17
Spicy!
This will be moist.
Posted 10:49pm 15/3/17
Good stuff...
Yeah there were heaps of Brits there and French but Gallipoli wasn't a pivotal moment for those nations. It was just a s*** fight...that they lost.
For Australia it had a lot more effect on the national identity.
And for the dude who says it was a defining moment for two young nations...The Ottoman EMPIRE was young???
Posted 04:05am 16/3/17
No, but New Zealand was
Posted 08:50am 16/3/17
That's what I figured he meant as well. Although the happenings in World War 1 were directly responsible for the creation of Turkey as a nation so maybe that's where confusion kicked in.