Source
Intel is planning to deliver cable content to any device with an Internet connection. And instead of having to pay $80 a month for two hundred channels you don't want, you'll be able to subscribe to specific channels of your choosing. This set-top box, said by industry insiders to be available to a limited beta of customers in March, will offer cable channels delivered “over the top” to televisions anywhere there is an Internet connection regardless of provider. (Microsoft Mediaroom, for example, requires AT&T’s service, and Xbox has limited offerings for Comcast and FiOS customers). For the first time, consumers will be able to subscribe to content per channel, unlike bundled cable services, and you may also be able to subscribe per show as well. Intel’s set-top box will also have access to Intel’s already existing app marketplace for apps, casual games, and video on demand. Leveraging the speed of current broadband, and the vast shared resources of the cloud, Intel plans to give customers the ability to use “Cloud DVR”, a feature intended to allow users to watch any past TV show at any time, without the need to record it ahead of time, pause live tv, and rewind shows in progress. Sounds pretty damn cool. As a consumer this is definately something i would be interested in, particularly subscribing to a single show or series. I think this is a pretty good step towards dealing with piracy. there is another article here which talks about the reasons this idea might fail and the hefty resistance Intel will face from content providers. |
Can I go one better and simply subscribe to shows, not channels?
|
Can I go one better and simply subscribe to shows, not channels? ... For the first time, consumers will be able to subscribe to content per channel, unlike bundled cable services, and you may also be able to subscribe per show as well. ???!!!?!?!?! :P |
Anything that puts more control in the hands of the consumer is a step in the right direction as far as i am concerned. Personally id like to see the death of normal comercial tv since i am completely over having the when and where of my viewing being dictated to me by a*******.
It also angers me greatly with the introduction of digital tv giving comercial access to more channels they have seen fit to use many of those channels to simply increase the presents of f*****g infomercials. So f***'em the sooner they die off the better. |
Great, but how about instead all these faffing external boxes you come up with an interconnect standard that would allow this functionality to be embedded in to a TV - either as a daughterboard or with some kind of standard interface?
How is it that every single device out there falls short and gets things wrong? |
Hi Foxtel - please take notice so I can start subscribing to individual channels rather than packages.
kthx |
sounds good but i doubt we will get it here in australia any time soon considering we haven't even got hulu or netflix yet.
|
Raven how many boxes do you currently have in your house providing you with your media/entertainment needs? Personally another box doesnt matter a s*** to me because if it offers the choices in viewing i want ill b ehappy to clear a spot on my tv unit for it.
|
I have netflix at my place in the US and i spend more time watching that than i do the cable tv we have. Thats is kind of suprising to be honest because netflix doesnt actually have that big of a range of viewing to choose from but at $7 a month i wont complain.
|
Hi Foxtel - please take notice so I can start subscribing to individual channels rather than packages.I was hoping they would use this model for Foxtel on xbox 360, the stupid a******* make you buy a base package and then entertainment/sport/movies packages to get anything of use. You're paying for the infrastructure and the hardware, There's no need for packages in this setup. I don't think per channel is enough anyway, needs per show/series purchasing options. |
Raven how many boxes do you currently have in your house providing you with your media/entertainment needs? Personally another box doesnt matter a s*** to me because if it offers the choices in viewing i want ill b ehappy to clear a spot on my tv unit for it. Okay, let's see: Out in the main room we've got a big LCD with a WD Live (v2), BD player, DVD player, VCR, PVR, Xbox and Amp. Out back there's an LCD with a DVD player, Wii and WD Live (v1). In my room there's an LCD with a PS3 and PVR... blah blah, you get the idea. For my new house I've bought a a TV and 7.1 system that has all those features again (each), then there's the PVR, PS3 and other bits and pieces that will be attached to it. We have eleventy billion different devices to do different things, on top of the newer TVs having many of these features built in. And for the most part, none of them do a perfect job. |
I have netflix at my place in the US and i spend more time watching that than i do the cable tv we have. Thats is kind of suprising to be honest because netflix doesnt actually have that big of a range of viewing to choose from but at $7 a month i wont complain.Quickflix is $16 a month here and they charge you $5 a month to stream the very same movies they will deliver to your door via snail mail for free. That's the problem I see with things like this, it will be too expensive and too restrictive to be worth it in Australia. It's not the device that matters, it's the service and they are limited heavily by outdated licensing setups. No matter what technology intel bring they won't be able to get around that hurdle. |
I think it's probably safe to throw out the vcr by now dude
|
I would be interested in the per-series option. If it was at a reasonable NON-AUSTRALIAN-TAX price. That is I'm willing to go 10% higher than the US price but no more if GST is involved.
|
So "Intel's war on pay TV" = Intel making pay TV less s***.
|
Quickflix is $16 a month here and they charge you $5 a month to stream the very same movies they will deliver to your door via snail mail for freeI'm confused by your wording, are you saying it is more expensive to stream than post (website pricing) or is this only a special scenario for the pay per play movies (new releases) and you pay a premium to stream those on top of the regular subscription costs? last edited by scuzzy at 14:52:54 02/Jan/13 |
For new releases they charge you $5 for a 48 hour license on top of your subscription. They will mail the very same new release movie to your door though as part of your already included subscription.
|
Foxtel is copping an absolute caning over the new Movie channels.
The old Movie Network is gone and due to some Movie agreements ending Foxtel is basically providing the Showtime package spread over 10 channels forming 2 packages. Foxtel is demanding lower prices and the Movie houses are holding out. As such Subs on the full Movies package are paying full price for half the Movies. The upside is all movie channels are now HD and dont carry watermarks. This box might work in America but it has no hope here. Foxtel has too much content sewed up and this box wont have Sport at least not AFL/NRL. Internet TVs dont need a box. The big crunch is coming though and Foxtel knows it. |
What about data usage? I use foxtel on my smart tv and it chews through a lot... all unmetered from bigpond but if you only had 50gb per month and its not unmetered content, you'd be screwed o.O
|
For new releases they charge you $5 for a 48 hour license on top of your subscription.Gotcha, cheers. |
Deadly my missus got netflix back when it first kicked off and it remains at $7 a month. We were getting dvds sent out but have since stopped doing that since they split the streaming and dvd mail service.
I dont know all the ins and outs but i do know its costs so little that i get reasonable bang for my buck. |
Hrm, judging by my steam experience, I'm happy to pay for what I currently pirate if there is a decent supply mechanism, but who even has a tv under the age of 30, needs a pc-based software platform ftw.
|
The problem with pay tv and movies is the companys who hold the licences to the things want a permeium price for it and so does the content provider (Austar/Foxtel). We will never get anywhere with things in this current state especially in Ausfailure.
I just need a browser/software based thing I can log onto and subscribe to channels and/or specific shows and pay a flat fee per month. Also having unlimited data or 250gb+ would be useful for this. |
I could go for something like that, pay a $5 or $10 sub per month to the history channel (example) and get access to all their channels and programs past and present without all the bulls*** of pay tv. Of course if they wanted to fill it full of f*****g ads id just s*** can them.
|
Dont underestimate Foxtel.
They are working on their 'own Netflix' (oh no Ive said too much) iQ3 will be out Q2 http://www.pace.com/global/our-portfolio/set-top-box/cable/dpc5000/ http://www.pace.com/Global/Images/Products/Page/1208_dzx5000_large.jpg up to 2 Tb Thats a lot of content. |
I tried Big Pond's HD movie content, just to see what it was like recently and was completely underwhelmed. I've seen R5 release's of better visual quality (seriously, this had massive digital grain on not just black scenes) and no surround sound, just stereo. Not doing it again anytime soon. |
For the first time, consumers will be able to subscribe to content per channel, unlike bundled cable services hallelujah. i'm sick of being approched by foxtel knobs in the shops asking if i want paytv when i want 4-6 channels only. "sorry sir we can't do that" FOAD. hey foxtel, give the people what they want! |
wouldnt a company rather have some money from people subscribing to individual shows, then just download everything?
f***** whingy c****... times are changing, they have to change with it. No-one wants to pay 80$+ a month to watch re-runs and ads about the f***** kardashians |
For the first time, consumers will be able to subscribe to content per channel, unlike bundled cable services The curious thing is how media companies are going to be pressured into it - popular channels pay for the niche ones - so I would imagine with this model things like history channel going away (sad face). Seems like an odd market for Intel to try to enter Yes, its definitely an odd market indeed. Intel isn't really big on the consumer electronics product side let alone making content deals. Maybe they are partnering with someone who is good on the consumer electronics product side :) And maybe who already has deals with media companies :) And maybe who has shown in the past their ability to change the media companies business model (and convince them to jump on board) :) And maybe that partner company has rumours of their own of "nailing the TV space" :) http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/01/mac_intel_handshake.jpg Just sayin :) |
while foxtel has sport, they wont be going anywhere. im quite happy to pay foxtels price so i can get my sport.
|
I suspect that even if premium channels can be offered seperately they wont be cheap.
Have you noticed how tough it is to order Chicken seperately at KFC ? They just want to sell you Fries and Gravy and Drinks, extras/side dishes. PayTV works by the subscriber buying more than they need, extras/side dishes to offset the cost of what they really want. PayTV is the same all over the World. The single channel fantasy you all want doesnt exist. PayTV here is too expensive and doesnt have enough channels. Thats the only difference to the World, that and of course, Competition. |
http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2006/01/mac_intel_handshake.jpg in this photo, i see a false god, and a fat stig |
<3
but I roll in HD and will always have fox whilst they have most of the sport |
lulz, but the ads!? and ITS SO EXPESNIVE!!?!?!?!?
|
i'm with spook here, the foxtel of 10 years ago was a little worth it, as you had less ads than tv (and they seemed to be like SBS's way, only at the begining middle and end, not 4 times in a 30 minute block
Ad's pay for the content and upkeep of equipment for normal free to air, the equipment used for foxtel isn't that costly anymore (those settop boxes are no doubt paid for in the first few months) in the case of cable, that s*** has been paid for, and the upkeep low. and while I love the sport, fat chance of me getting to watch much if i did have it. so where is the value? |
. As a consumer this is definately something i would be interested in, As an AUSTRALIAN consumer you will never have access to this. unless i missed something in the article that stated it would be available here.. |
lol I pay $70 a month for 'basic' + sport + HD (inc IQ2) its cheap imo
you don't need any other channels, everything else is available elsewhere and the fkn movies take forever to get to foxtel and are available in the video stores anyway! plus if I were to go to the pub to watch a match, which I would if I didn't have it, then one night at the pub and it'd be paid for!! Or maybe 2 if it was a school night, but chances are I'd go for a feed and a few beers so it'd easily be over $50. My parents have all chans in HD plus 3 extra boxes but they only watch a few channels and never watch movies on it so it's kinda a waste for them. |
I don't pay anything and use friends foxtel to watch the sports and the tv's and it works great.
Also more sociable than drinking a beer wishing your wifey would leave you alone. |
Don't watch sport and don't pay for foxtel
/profit + win = m0re win! |
I have fetchtv $14.95 wouldnt say it isnt worth it, but its ok....
|
no sport = fail
nah - you just don't pay attention to sources that deliver. I hope you aren't in a position to influence younguns in the wrong direction.. er wait.. what is hte 'right direction' again.... it heppens my mind boggles when considering the options that may have been at my fingertips if i spoke another language. yeah.. lets consider German to be 'off the table' meanwhile.. |