As those keeping an eye on our
E3 Videos Page will have already noticed, Bethesda have released their
E3 2008 trailer for the hotly anticipated Fallout 3. The 3 minute clip shows off more of the Fallout staple retro style and the first real in-game action.
Also, AusGamers intrepid E3 2008 reporters trog and steve capped the actual Fallout 3 gameplay demonstration from today's Xbox Media Briefing which you can now see for yourself
right here in our video library.
Posted 03:51pm 15/7/08
Posted 03:56pm 15/7/08
Posted 04:00pm 15/7/08
Posted 04:53pm 15/7/08
When the dude who got a speak peak at it said it was pretty much like oblivion but with guns (like it was a good thing or something, lol) i pretty much gave up on it.
Posted 05:03pm 15/7/08
Posted 05:19pm 15/7/08
Posted 05:55pm 15/7/08
It's not a true sequal unless it invovles Vault 13 in some way. :P
Posted 06:01pm 15/7/08
Posted 06:25pm 15/7/08
Posted 06:55pm 15/7/08
Posted 07:00pm 15/7/08
Posted 07:03pm 15/7/08
Posted 07:09pm 15/7/08
I haven't really got anything negative to say on the gameplay, apart from the first-person shooting looking kind of clumsy, because they didn't show much. But it doesn't seem like they've really learned anything from Oblivion in terms of how a game should look in motion. If anyone here thinks Oblivion had good animation/physics/AI behaviour, you're delusional.
Posted 07:10pm 15/7/08
why should they listen to fanboys? they have some rosey eyed idea of what the original game was like and get upset whenever they deviate slightly from that rosey image with the sequels/remakes. like you just did.
Posted 07:12pm 15/7/08
Posted 07:14pm 15/7/08
i honestly cant say i care for first person view, i knew from day dot id play from 3rd person.
Posted 07:28pm 15/7/08
Posted 08:30pm 15/7/08
I watched both. I'll admit, the animations and physics do have that same floaty feel to them as oblivion, though, I still think they're far far better than oblivion. I guess it doesn't bother me as much, It was never a deal breaker for me in Oblivion either. I mean, I recognise it had some horrible animations in it, but it wasn't enough to really affect my enjoyment of the game. Same as Mass Effect, the combat in that was at times pretty s***, and some of the animations seemed a bit stiff at times, but it didn't hamper my enjoyment of the game at all, so I'm sure I'll still love Fallout 3 :)
When I heard mini nuclear bomb catapault, I was sold.
Posted 08:59pm 15/7/08
last edited by Midda at 20:59:13 15/Jul/08
Posted 09:01pm 15/7/08
Posted 09:19pm 15/7/08
Fallout fanboys are rabid, they bite. I'm one of them.
I'm scared this Fallout will have scaling enemies like Oblivion, that really s*** me off and ultimately killed Oblivion for me. What's the point of getting mega tough when simple rats scale with you. Also, what is the point of being weak as when there is barley anyone tougher then you.. So in that system, leveling seems like a futile pointless exercise.
When I saw Fallout 3: Van Buren I cried a little knowing what fallout 3 could have been.
It better be good, now to cry as I watch the Gameplay footage.
Posted 09:23pm 15/7/08
Posted 09:39pm 15/7/08
Posted 10:38pm 15/7/08
Posted 12:09am 16/7/08
It's not an RPG if you have to strafe.
Posted 12:34am 16/7/08
you fanboys played fallout 2 even though the graphics looked like s***, why gripe about the graphics in fallout 3.
if you want to play fallout 2 just play fallout 2.
Posted 12:39am 16/7/08
Posted 08:21am 16/7/08
Posted 08:49am 16/7/08
Posted 08:52am 16/7/08
Posted 09:00am 16/7/08
Posted 09:38am 16/7/08
It didn't look like twitch gameplay to me at all, it looked like a lot of pausing the action, choosing your target and your location on the target you want to shoot, then watching as your action plays out. Not really twitched based FPS gameplay, much more in the style of how Fallout combat worked imo.
Posted 09:50am 16/7/08
Posted 11:34am 16/7/08
Posted 11:48am 16/7/08
Posted 11:49am 16/7/08
Posted 11:51am 16/7/08
Posted 01:10pm 16/7/08
unless you have some sort of motor neuron disease (like a genetic based one) i think you'll be able to play the game.
the only thing i don't understand is why fanboys who have been waiting 10 years for another fallout game are suddenly hanging s*** on one they've only seen 90 seconds of. why? because in 10 years the game suddenly discovered a 3rd dimension.
cry more f***.
Posted 01:44pm 16/7/08
I'm not a fanboy, I suck at RPG's and haven't ever finished an RPG in my life, yet I still think that going FPS is the wrong idea.
Maybe the reason that it's getting a lot of s*** for being FPS is because it's a fallout game? I think I agree with Dan when he said they shouldn't have made it a direct sequel.
We have too many FPS RPG's anyway.
Posted 06:10pm 16/7/08
Posted 06:21pm 16/7/08
thats what i was implying.
Posted 06:37pm 16/7/08
I don't like the idea of scaling enemies someone earlier in the thread mentioned? The whole slog of getting powerarmour in the originals was made so sweet when you could then single-handly take on armies using powder weapons.
Posted 06:37pm 16/7/08
It has that you f*****g imbecile.
Posted 08:03pm 16/7/08
Fallout 1/2 could almost be played entirely by the mouse, very laid back, even the combat. That was part of Fallout's charm, this Fallout requires a more active approach (the twitch aspect) and that, I believe, is what people are fearing.
Posted 10:51pm 16/7/08
also i wouldn't exactly call playing an FPS active, so you don't need to worry about working up a sweat if that's what you are fearing. (lol fearing)
Posted 11:13pm 16/7/08
Posted 12:03am 17/7/08
Posted 10:11am 17/7/08
Posted 11:19am 17/7/08
I'd personally prefer the 3/4 isometric look of the fallout 3 someone linked from wikipedia, because as mentioned it was a more laid back enjoyable way to play, but I'll still play this new one through (assuming it's better than STALKER).
And I agree that if they do the scaling enemies it will be gay, I too found great joy in finally geting power-armour and being able to obliterate a force of well armed raiders using only the Pancor Jackhamer and Powered-gauntlets.
Posted 11:33am 17/7/08
not hearing a lot of rational talk from you fallout fanboys.
so not only to fallout fanboys hate fast paced games they also dislike ones with any difficulty.
Posted 12:23pm 17/7/08
Posted 12:44pm 17/7/08
It was returned the next day.
Posted 01:30pm 17/7/08
There's still plenty of difficulty in the game, it just means that at lvl15 you're not gonna get pwnt by rats or gecko's. There's still gonna be mini-cannon totting super-mutants but it also means that you have NO chance against them at level 1, but as you progress you'll see positive use for your levels/exp.
Posted 01:35pm 17/7/08
It's being developed for xbox360, it'll be easy as piss.
Posted 04:43pm 17/7/08
Clearly you haven't read the thread because I'm the one defending the game from fanboys who are attacking it with stupid fanboy comments.
Fanboys like yourself are having a teary because its an fps-rpg. Now i don't see how making the player MORE involved in the gameplay than just clicking once can some how take away from the atmosphere of the game. Surely being more involved would add to the immersion. The only reason the original game was isometric was because thats all you could do back then. You couldn't have 30 characters on screen in a 3d game back then. You couldn't have massive open environments in 3d back then.
So what, 10 years later, technology has moved on. The game has moved on, yet the fanboys haven't.